An alternate approach to hospital cost control: the Rochester project.

Sorensen, Andrew A.; Saward, Ernest W.

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

An alternate approach to hospital cost control: the Rochester project.

1978 Jul-Aug
By Sorensen, Andrew A. ; Saward, Ernest W.
Source: Public Health Rep. 93(4):311-317

[PDF-1.27 MB]

English

Details Related Documents You May Also Like

Details:

Alternative Title:

Public Health Rep
Personal Author:

Sorensen, Andrew A. ; Saward, Ernest W.

Sorensen, Andrew A. ; Saward, Ernest W. Less -
Description:

The rapid escalation in health care costs has demonstrated a need to control costs in general and hospital costs in particular. In New York State, efforts at control have followed one of several paths, including reduction of Medicaid program expenditures, elimination of hospital beds, and prospective reimbursement of hospital costs. Although some success has been achieved in each of these areas, hospital costs containment has not been as successful as had been hoped. A new project called MAXICAP, being developed in the Rochester region, seeks to link payment with regional hospital planning. MAXICAP represents a voluntary attempt by hospitals, third party payers, planners, consumers, and governmental agencies to devise a prospective hospital payment system. Under this system community hospital plans in the Rochester region would be integrated and a cap imposed on both revenues and expenses for acute hospital care. The principal advantage of the MAXICAP is that it offers a mechanism for linking hospital planning with payment functions on a regional basis. The principal disadvantage is that the success of the MAXICAP depends upon the voluntary cooperation of the vast majority of the acute care hospitals in the area--hospitals that may be scattered throughout a relatively large region.
Subjects:

[+]

Costs And Cost Analysis Economics, Hospital Health Expenditures Hospital Bed Capacity Hospital Planning Insurance, Health, Reimbursement Medicaid Research Article Social Control, Formal
Source:

Public Health Rep. 93(4):311-317
Pubmed ID:

98805
Pubmed Central ID:

PMCnull
Document Type:

Journal Article
Place as Subject:

New York
Volume:

93
Issue:

4
Collection(s):

Public Health Reports
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:4e036dc82052aa0a29859b4b8a3fe45fdcef734dc289c91d9dda64c30af8cf8f
Download URL:

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/65446/cdc_65446_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

An alternate approach to hospital cost control: the Rochester project.

Details:

Supporting Files

Related Documents

You May Also Like