Comparisons of referral criteria for public screening of blood cholesterol levels.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Comparisons of referral criteria for public screening of blood cholesterol levels.

Filetype[PDF-1.79 MB]


  • English
    • Details Related Documents You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Public Health Rep
    • Personal Author:
    • Description:
      Total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels of 2,387 adults were screened at a worksite and a bloodbank. Hypothetical referral decisions were made according to three sets of guidelines: the 1984 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference guidelines (NIHCC), a single referral cutpoint of 5.2 millimoles per liter (mmol per L), and the current National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines for screening in physicians' office. Under the NIHCC guidelines, 31 percent of the participants would have been referred to their physicians, 32 percent under the NCEP guidelines, and 56 percent would have been referred had the 5.2 mmol per L cutpoint been used. Twenty-four percent of the participants would have been referred under both the NIHCC and NCEP guidelines; 7 percent would have been referred under the NIHCC guidelines, but not the NCEP's. Eight percent would have been referred under the NCEP guidelines, but not the NIHCC's. Those who would have been referred were older, and more likely to be male and to have low levels of HDL cholesterol than the 7 percent who would have been referred under NIHCC guidelines only. All of the 8 percent had coronary heart disease, or two or more other coronary risk factors, whereas none of the 7 percent did. If low HDL had been used as a risk factor under NCEP guidelines, the number of persons referred would have increased slightly (to 34 percent) and low HDL levels would have become one of the most prevalent risk factors. The researchers concluded that public cholesterol screening programs should use the NCEP guidelines (with or without HDL), rather than the NIHCC guidelines, or a single 5.2 mmol per L cutpoint.
    • Subjects:
    • Source:
      Public Health Rep. 104(5):425-432
    • Pubmed ID:
      2508171
    • Pubmed Central ID:
      PMCnull
    • Document Type:
      Journal Article
    • Funding:
      HL 37892/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
    • Name as Subject:
      National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
    • Place as Subject:
      Ohio
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    Related Documents

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov