Using staff input to set priorities in an Indian Health Service clinic.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Using staff input to set priorities in an Indian Health Service clinic.

  • 1987 Jul-Aug

  • Source: Public Health Rep. 102(4):369-372
Filetype[PDF-630.18 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Public Health Rep
    • Personal Author:
    • Description:
      The McLaughlin Public Health Service clinic serves several thousand Lakota people (Sioux) on Standing Rock Indian Reservation, SD. In 1981, a priority-setting exercise established for the first time a grassroots expression of the concerns of the clinic's staff. A three-step process was used in which each staff member first compiled an open-ended list of health needs, then ranked the relative contribution of five factors to making these problems important, and assessed each problem listed by those factors. The factors used were mortality, morbidity, vulnerability to intervention, facilities on hand, and social implications. The resulting priority table represented each person's assessment of the health needs of the community. A composite table was created to represent the group's assessment. The staff concluded that among the many problems listed, alcoholism and diabetes were the most compelling health problems. The priority score was almost identical for each, but the reasons were different. Alcoholism was rated highly because it was felt to be widespread and had serious social implications. Diabetes was ranked highly because it was felt to be lethal and vulnerable to intervention. A significant long-term benefit to the clinic of the 3-month process was to stimulate consultation within the local clinic and to unify the health team, endowing the members with a common sense of purpose.
    • Pubmed ID:
      3112845
    • Pubmed Central ID:
      PMCnull
    • Document Type:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    Related Documents

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov