Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction in the HIV Outpatient Study
Supporting Files
-
Sep 09 2016
-
Available in CDC Stacks on 2017-10-02T00:00:00Z
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Clin Infect Dis
-
Personal Author:Thompson-Paul, Angela M. ; Lichtenstein, Kenneth A. ; Armon, Carl ; Palella, Frank J. ; Skarbinski, Jacek ; Chmiel, Joan S. ; Hart, Rachel ; Wei, Stanley C. ; Loustalot, Fleetwood ; Brooks, John T. ; Buchacz, Kate
-
Description:Background ; Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction tools are often applied to populations beyond those in which they were designed when validated tools for specific subpopulations are unavailable. ; Methods ; Using data from 2283 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected adults aged ≥18 years, who were active in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS), we assessed performance of 3 commonly used CVD prediction models developed for general populations: Framingham general cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS), American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort equations (PCEs), and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) high-risk equation, and 1 model developed in HIV-infected persons: the Data Collection on Adverse Effects of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) study equation. C-statistics assessed model discrimination and the ratio of expected to observed events (E/O) and Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2P value assessed calibration. ; Results ; From January 2002 through September 2013, 195 (8.5%) HOPS participants experienced an incident CVD event in 15 056 person-years. The FRS demonstrated moderate discrimination and was well calibrated (C-statistic: 0.66, E/O: 1.01, P = .89). The PCE and D:A:D risk equations demonstrated good discrimination but were less well calibrated (C-statistics: 0.71 and 0.72 and E/O: 0.88 and 0.80, respectively; P < .001 for both), whereas SCORE performed poorly (C-statistic: 0.59, E/O: 1.72; P = .48). ; Conclusions ; Only the FRS accurately estimated risk of CVD events, while PCE and D:A:D underestimated risk. Although these models could potentially be used to rank US HIV-infected individuals at higher or lower risk for CVD, the models may fail to identify substantial numbers of HIV-infected persons with elevated CVD risk who could potentially benefit from additional medical treatment.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Clin Infect Dis. 63(11):1508-1516.
-
Pubmed ID:27613562
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5624518
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:63
-
Issue:11
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:1b266936c68a25514a75a86efd4d28c62b7976d23f9974f9ca3c9e02809e1221
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access