Effectiveness of Barcoding for Reducing Patient Specimen and Laboratory Testing Identification Errors: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Snyder, Susan R.; Favoretto, Alessandra M.; Derzon, James H.; Christenson, Robert; Kahn, Stephen; Shaw, Colleen; Baetz, Rich Ann; Mass, Diana; Fantz, Corrine; Raab, Stephen; Tanasijevic, Milenko; Liebow, Edward B.

doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.019

- Add this to...
- Twitter
- Facebook
- Google Bookmarks
- LinkedIn

Effectiveness of Barcoding for Reducing Patient Specimen and Laboratory Testing Identification Errors: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published Date:

Jun 28 2012

Publisher's site:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.019 New Site Icon

Source:

Clin Biochem. 45(0):988-998

Language:

English

[PDF-1.27 MB]

Details:

Personal Authors:

Snyder, Susan R. ; Favoretto, Alessandra M. ; Derzon, James H. ; Christenson, Robert ; Kahn, Stephen ; ... More ▼

Keywords:

[+]

Pubmed ID:

22750145

Pubmed Central ID:

PMC4518452

Description:

Objectives

This is the first systematic review of the effectiveness of barcoding practices for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors.

Design and Methods

The CDC-funded Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Initiative systematic review methods for quality improvement practices were used.

Results

A total of 17 observational studies reporting on barcoding systems are included in the body of evidence; 10 for patient specimens and 7 for point-of-care testing. All 17 studies favored barcoding, with meta-analysis mean odds ratios for barcoding systems of 4.39 (95% CI: 3.05 – 6.32) and for point-of-care testing of 5.93 (95% CI: 5.28 – 6.67).

Conclusions

Barcoding is effective for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors in diverse hospital settings and is recommended as an evidence-based “best practice.” The overall strength of evidence rating is high and the effect size rating is substantial. Unpublished studies made an important contribution comprising almost half of the body of evidence.

Document Type:

Journal Article

Collection(s):

CDC Public Access

Funding:

CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS/United States
W911NF-07-D-0001/DO 0191/TCN 07235/PHS HHS/United States

Main Document Checksum:

[+]

Supporting Files:

	nihms692399f4.jpg	image/jpeg
	nihms692399.nxml	text/xml
	nihms692399f1.gif	image/gif
	nihms692399f1.jpg	image/jpeg
	nihms692399f2.gif	image/gif
	nihms692399f2.jpg	image/jpeg
	nihms692399f3.gif	image/gif
	nihms692399f3.jpg	image/jpeg
	nihms692399f4.gif	image/gif

No Related Documents.

You May Also Like:

Laboratory medicine best practices : developing systematic evidence review and evaluation : methods for quality improvement phase 3 final technical report

Personal Author:

Snyder, Susan; Liebow, Edward; Shaw, Colleen; Black, Robert; Christenson, Robert; Derzon, James; Epner, Paul; Favoretto, Alessandra; John, Lisa; Mass, Diana; Patta, Abrienne; Rose, Shyanika W.; Washingto, Malaika;

Corporate Author:

CDC Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Team.. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Sciences. Laboratory Science, Policy and Practice Program Office. Division of Laboratory Science and Standards..

Published:

May 27, 2010

Series:

Methods for quality improvement ; phase 3 final technical report

Description:

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This report summarizes the third phase of an ongoing effort sponsored by the Division of Laboratory Science and Standards (DLSS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The purpose is to develop new systematic evidence re...

File Type:

[PDF - 2.83 MB]
Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reducing Patient Misidentification Due to Specimen Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: LMBP™ Systematic Review

Personal Author:

Sandhu, Paramjit; Bandyopadhyay, Kakali; Ernst, Dennis J.; Hunt, William; Taylor, Thomas H.; Birch, Rebecca; Krolak, John; Geaghan, Sharon;

Published:

Sep 2017

Source:

J Appl Lab Med. 2(2):244-258

Description:

Background : Specimen labeling errors have long plagued the laboratory industry putting patients at risk of transfusion-related death, medication errors, misdiagnosis, and patient mismanagement. Many interventions have been implemented and deemed to ...

File Type:

[PDF - 1.28 MB]
Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis☆

Personal Author:

Snyder, Susan R.; Favoretto, Alessandra M.; Baetz, Rich Ann; Derzon, James H.; Madison, Bereneice M.; Mass, Diana; Shaw, Colleen S.; Layfield, Christopher D.; Christenson, Robert H.; Liebow, Edward B.;

Published:

Jun 16 2012

Source:

Clin Biochem. 2012; 45(0):999-1011

Description:

Objectives : This article is a systematic review of the effectiveness of three practices for reducing blood culture contamination rates: venipuncture, phlebotomy teams, and prepackaged preparation/collection (prep) kits. : Design and methods : The CD...

File Type:

[PDF - 1.10 MB]
Laboratory medicine : a national status report

Corporate Author:

Lewin Group. Battelle Memorial Institute. National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases (U.S.). Division of Laboratory Systems..

Published:

May 2008

Description:

Although the U.S. ranks highest in per capita health care spending, there is overwhelming evidence of gaps between well-founded standards of care and health care practice. The Institute of Medicine reports, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health Sy...

File Type:

[PDF - 2.24 MB]
Effectiveness of Automated Notification and Customer Service Call Centers for Timely and Accurate Reporting of Critical Values: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Personal Author:

Liebow, Edward B.; Derzon, James H.; Fontanesi, John; Favoretto, Alessandra M.; Baetz, Rich Ann; Shaw, Colleen; Thompson, Pamela; Mass, Diana; Christenson, Robert; Epner, Paul; Snyder, Susan R.;

Published:

Jun 29 2012

Source:

Clin Biochem. 45(0):979-987

Description:

Objective : To conduct a systematic review of automatic notification methods and consider evidence-based recommendations for best practices in improving the timeliness and accuracy of critical value reporting. : Results : 196 bibliographic records we...

File Type:

[PDF - 1.00 MB]