U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Indirect Protection From Rotavirus Vaccines: a Systematic Review.

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Expert Review of Vaccines, 2025, v. 23, no. 1: Indirect Protection From Rotavirus Vaccines: a Systematic Review.
  • Journal Article:
    Expert Review of Vaccines
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Rotavirus vaccines may provide indirect protection by reducing transmission in the population and thus reducing disease burden.

    This systematic review summarizes estimates of indirect protection from rotavirus vaccines and the methods used to obtain these estimates.

    We identified 71 studies published between 2009 and 2022 that provided 399 estimates of indirect protection from rotavirus vaccine. Most estimates (73%) evaluated hospitalizations due to rotavirus gastroenteritis as the outcome and unvaccinated children <5 years old as the agegroup (64%), but there was considerable variability in methods to evaluate indirect protection. For hospitalizations due to rotavirus gastroenteritis among unvaccinated children <5 years old, the median incidence rate ratio was 0.60 (IQR: 0.40-0.87,

     = 110 estimates), the median relative percent change in percent positivity was 25% (IQR: 13-44%,

     = 49 estimates), and the median relative percent change in absolute number of rotavirus positive tests or rotavirus-specific International Classification of Diseases codes was 42% (IQR: 16-66%,

     = 40 estimates).

    These findings broadly suggest rotavirus vaccines provide some indirect protection. There is a need to standardize measurement of indirect rotavirus vaccine protection, particularly using consistent outcomes and metrics, and stratifying results by standardized age groups and years since vaccine introduction.
  • Content Notes:
    Author manuscript
  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Expert Review of Vaccines, 2025, v. 23, no. 1
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    1476-0584 ; 1744-8395
  • Pubmed ID:
    39167375
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC12107528
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • Pages in Document:
    789-795 (17 pdf pages)
  • Volume:
    23
  • Issue:
    1
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 523.64 KB]
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:6c4076b4db21d4b0ab37f05e385ff56153605f1e1a4ff0bf528d081c994f1f7cd7fc12f267aeef1b409f696021894d6a5e65445696d4c35b14ee5fe864be4ca0
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
 Was this page helpful?
 Found an issue?
Send us an email at:
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.