Evaluation of the Current State of Thyroid Hormone Testing in Human Serum-Results of the Free Thyroxine and Thyrotropin Interlaboratory Comparison Study.
Supporting Files
-
May 2025
-
Available in CDC Stacks on April 29, 2026, 12:00 AM
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Thyroid : Official Journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2025, v. 35, no. 5: Evaluation of the Current State of Thyroid Hormone Testing in Human Serum-Results of the Free Thyroxine and Thyrotropin Interlaboratory Comparison Study.
-
Journal Article:Thyroid : Official Journal of the American Thyroid Association
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Performance of thyroid function assays can vary significantly. To address this issue, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Clinical Standardization Programs conducted an interlaboratory comparison of free thyroxine (fT4) immunoassays (IAs) and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). This assessment aimed to determine the current performance characteristics of these assays as a first step toward measurement standardization. Thyrotropin (TSH) IAs were also evaluated.
Assays measured 41 blinded individual-donor sera, including a sample from a pregnant woman (for fT4 analysis only) and three serum pools, with 11.3-32.1 pmol/L (0.881-2.49 ng/dL) fT4 and 0.337-21.6 mIU/L TSH in duplicate over 2 days. Passing-Bablok regression analysis performed pre-recalibration compared assays performance to the CDC fT4 reference measurement procedure (RMP) or TSH all-lab mean (ALM). Additionally, the impact of linear regression-based recalibration of assays to the CDC fT4 RMP or TSH ALM was estimated. Inter-assay agreement of sample classification according to the assay-specific reference interval (RI) was assessed pre- and post-recalibration.
A total of 21 fT4 and 17 TSH assays participated. Pre-recalibration, median biases of TSH measurements to the ALM were -1.2% confidence interval or CI -1.8% to -0.4%, and good classification agreement among TSH assays was observed. fT4 assays all showed a negative median bias to the RMP, with higher bias among IAs (median: -20.3%, CI -21.5% to -19.4%) than LDTs (median: -4.5%, CI -6.1% to -3.2%). Of the individual-donor sera, only 21 out of 40 samples were classified uniformly by all fT4 assays, indicating poor inter-assay agreement. Post-recalibration, agreement improved to 33 out of 40 individual-donor sera correctly classified by all tested IAs and LDTs. Similar improvement in post-recalibration median percent bias was observed for fT4 IAs (median: -0.2, CI -1.2% to 0.6%) and LDTs (median: -0.3%, CI -2.5% to 1.4%).
The comparison among fT4 assays emphasizes the need for measurement standardization to improve accuracy and comparability. This and previous studies demonstrate the possibility to develop common fT4 RIs via standardization, enabling the use of evidence-based clinical guidelines universally in patient care. Recalibration can effectively address high variability in fT4 assays, ensuring consistent diagnostic classification. -
Content Notes:Author manuscript
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Thyroid : Official Journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2025, v. 35, no. 5
-
DOI:
-
ISSN:1050-7256 ; 1557-9077
-
Pubmed ID:40333029
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC13126375
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Pages in Document:471-484 (24 pdf pages)
-
Volume:35
-
Issue:5
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:da92f9f98d930ef00925671537627a8ef7e296473cf267e683381658fd4983ea1a2115a5e1d4bde1585ced69cef8dd120c9371e35c62b09a09b7e77a6bf65c4b
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access