Fit Testing of N95 Respirators: A Pilot Study on Respirator Design and Demographic Factors
Peer Reviewed
-
2026/05/13
File Language:
English
Details
-
Journal Article:Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health are widely used by healthcare workers to prevent the inhalation of hazardous airborne contaminants. Various nose-clip shapes and respirator styles in N95 FFRs are designed to eliminate gaps between the respirator and the wearer's facial skin, ensuring adequate protection for the wearer. However, variations in facial dimensions across sexes and races may affect the fit and, consequently, the performance of these respirators. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of N95 FFR design, specifically the nose-clip shape and respirator style, on the fit factor (FF). The second aim was to assess how subject characteristics, specifically sex and race, affect the respirator fit. Additionally, the efficacy of N95 FFRs may degrade over prolonged use. The authors recently developed a portable device called the Exposure Protection Integrated Communicator (EPIC) that uses dual optical sensors to measure particle concentrations inside and outside the workplace and provide real-time monitoring of the workplace protection factor for FFRs. The EPIC's performance was evaluated by comparing its results with the reference PortaCount fit tester. Two cup-shaped FFRs with different noseclip shapes and six N95 FFRs with various styles were tested. Twenty human subjects were recruited to perform the Occupational Safety and Health Administration approved quantitative fit test (QNFT) protocol by running both PortaCount and EPIC devices in triplicate with each respirator. Results indicated that respirator FF was significantly affected by respirator design and subject facial characteristics. Caucasian males generally achieved the best fit, while Hispanic or Latino females had the poorest fit, highlighting the need for design improvements that account for differences in sex and race. Additionally, the comparison between EPIC and PortaCount demonstrated a strong proportional bias, with EPIC tending to report higher fit factor values, particularly under conditions where the respirator achieved higher fit factors. These findings underscore the need for cautious interpretation and potential calibration before EPIC can be reliably used in occupational settings. Description provided by NIOSH
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:J Occup Environ Hyg 2026 May; :Epub ahead of print
-
ISSN:1545-9624
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:14 pdf pages
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20071649
-
Contact Point Address:Jun Wang, Department of Environmental and Public Health Science, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056
-
Email:jun.wang@uc.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2026
-
Performing Organization:University of Cincinnati
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
End Date:20260630
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:46e5e5c74b909daaca01545096f4cd6024ac4204a119221379a9549b59f683b9725802b507a5687939e69419b6245a1b2f54be7679b72fef9c0ec716fdbee59f
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like