Testing the Shock Protection Performance of Type I Construction Helmets Using Impactors of Different Masses (Dataset)
Dataset
Public Domain
-
2024/07/26
-
-
Series: NIOSH Data
File Language:
English
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Corporate Authors:
-
Description:Download the Dataset decsribed here from Data.cdc.gov at https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHRD-1087-2024-0.
Top impacts are considered essential tests to evaluate the shock absorption performance of commonly used type I industrial helmets. Currently, there are two major test standards that are widely applied in helmet industry: ANSI/ISEA Z89.1 and EN397. Since drop impacts are performed using different impactors and at drop heights, results obtained using different test standards are not directly comparable. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate and compare the helmet impact test results obtained using these two frequently used helmet test standards. A representative basic Type I construction helmet model was selected for the study. A total of 19 drop impact tests were performed at different drop heights and with two different impactors (3.6 kg and 5.0 kg). Group (a) contains 10 drop impacts performed using the 3.6 kg impactor at drop heights from 0.31 m to 1.93 m. Group (b) contains 9 drop impacts performed using the 5.0 kg impactor at drop heights from 0.22 m to 1.32 m. Each of the impact trials was replicated four times. Relationships between the peak impact force and the drop height for these two test groups were analyzed and compared. When the helmets were tested with potential impact energy smaller than critical values, a consistent trend for the relationship of peak impact force as a function of the potential impact energy was obtained. Our results show that our previously proposed quantitative evaluation approach for industrial helmets' shock absorption performance can be used with either the ANSI/ISEA Z89.1 or EN395 standard to quantify industrial helmets' shock absorption performance. Furthermore, our results illustrated that the peak impact force would not be a reliable parameter to evaluate the helmets' safety margin. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Series:
-
DOI:
-
Landing Page:
-
Dataset Download URL:
-
Identifier:
-
Format:
-
Publisher:
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Media Type:application/zip
-
Described By Type:HTML Repository Page
-
License:
-
Rights:Public Domain
-
Described By:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Contact Point:Division of Safety Research (DSR). Protective Technology Branch (PTB)
-
Pages in Document:1 ZIP folder
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20069903
-
Citation:Morgantown, WV: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Research Dataset RD-1087-2024-0, 2024 Jul; :dataset
-
Email:sa-cin-webteam@cdc.gov
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2024
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:03c03cb4711ed513f10b14dc05dfabe60143ba1ea67b6d225fbb679d02366a73b29535205476173eedfeeacc0c96b9e8af34124a9536b3c07ce351090c8d885c
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like