Details:

Alternative Title:
Prev Chronic Dis
Personal Author:
Besculides, Melanie; Zaveri, Heather; Farris, Rosanne; Will, Julie;
Besculides, Melanie; Zaveri, Heather; Farris, Rosanne; Will, Julie; Less -
Description:
Introduction Recommendations on best practices typically are drawn from unique settings; these practices are challenging to implement in programs already in operation. We describe an evaluation that identifies best practices in implementing lifestyle interventions in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's WISEWOMAN program and discuss our lessons learned in using the approach. Methods We used a mixed-methods evaluation that integrated quantitative and qualitative inquiry. Five state or tribal WISEWOMAN projects were included in the study. The projects were selected on the basis of availability of quantitative program performance data, which were used to identify two high-performing and one low-performing site within each project. We collected qualitative data through interviews, observation, and focus groups so we could understand the practices and strategies used to select and implement the interventions. Data were analyzed in a multistep process that included summarization, identification of themes and practices of interest, and application of an algorithm. Results Pilot testing data collection methods allowed for critical revisions. Conducting preliminary interviews allowed for more in-depth interviews while on site. Observing the lifestyle intervention being administered was key to understanding the program. Conducting focus groups with participants helped to validate information from other sources and offered a more complete picture of the program. Conclusion Using a mixed-methods evaluation minimized the weaknesses inherent in each method and improved the completeness and quality of data collected. A mixed-methods evaluation permits triangulation of data and is a promising strategy for identifying best practices.
Subject:
[+]
Adult
Benchmarking
Cardiovascular Diseases
Data Collection
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Interviews As Topic
Middle Aged
Original Research
Program Evaluation
Women's Health

Source:
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006; 3(1).;
Document Type:
Journal Article;
Name as Subject:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.);
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); Less -
Place as Subject:
United States;
Collection(s):
Preventing Chronic Disease
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:47979cda7f7c6bdd85a69a11b7e32fb81700b2d8ff6378b7adcacd3eeb9f6844
File Type:

Supporting Files

• 	PCD31A07s03.gif	gif
  	PCD31A07s03.jpg	jpeg
  	PCD31A07s04.gif	gif
  	PCD31A07s04.jpg	jpeg
  	05_0133_01.pdf	pdf
  	05_0133_03.pdf	pdf
  	license.txt	txt
  	PCD31A07.nxml	txt
  	PCD31A07s01.gif	gif
  	PCD31A07s01.jpg	jpeg
  	PCD31A07s02.gif	gif
  	PCD31A07s02.jpg	jpeg

More +