Comparing competing geospatial measures to capture the relationship between the neighborhood food environment and diet
Supporting Files
-
9 2021
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Ann Epidemiol
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Purpose:
To examine how the choice of neighborhood food environment definition impacts the association with diet.
Methods:
Using food frequency questionnaire data from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study at baseline (2003–2007), we calculated participants’ dietary inflammation score (DIS) (n=20,331); higher scores indicate greater pro-inflammatory exposure. We characterized availability of supermarkets and fast food restaurants using several geospatial measures, including density (i.e., counts/km2) and relative measures (i.e., percentage of all food stores or restaurants); and various buffer distances, including administrative units (census tract) and empirically-derived buffers (“classic” network, “sausage” network) tailored to community type (higher-density urban, lower-density urban, suburban/small town, rural). Using generalized estimating equations, we estimated the association between each geospatial measure and DIS, controlling for individual- and neighborhood-level sociodemographics.
Results:
The choice of buffer-based measure did not change the direction or magnitude of associations with DIS. Effect estimates derived from administrative units were smaller than those derived from tailored empirically-derived buffer measures. Substantively, a 10% increase in the percentage of fast food restaurants using a “classic” network buffer was associated with a 6.3 (SE=1.17) point higher DIS (p<0.001). The relationship between the percentage of supermarkets and DIS, however, was null. We observed high correlation coefficients between buffer-based density measures of supermarkets and fast food restaurants (r=0.73–0.83), which made it difficult to estimate independent associations by food outlet type.
Conclusions:
Researchers should tailor buffer-based measures to community type in future studies, and carefully consider the theoretical and statistical implications for choosing relative (vs. absolute) measures.
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Ann Epidemiol. 61:1-7
-
Pubmed ID:34051343
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC8592302
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:U01 DP006299/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHSUnited States/ ; U01DP006302/ACL/ACL HHSUnited States/ ; U01 DP006293/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHSUnited States/ ; U01 DP006296/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHSUnited States/ ; U01DP006296/ACL/ACL HHSUnited States/ ; U01DP006293/ACL/ACL HHSUnited States/ ; P30 DK111022/DK/NIDDK NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01 AG049970/AG/NIA NIH HHSUnited States/ ; R01 NS092706/NS/NINDS NIH HHSUnited States/ ; U01DP006299/ACL/ACL HHSUnited States/ ; U01 NS041588/NS/NINDS NIH HHSUnited States/ ; U01 DP006302/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHSUnited States/
-
Volume:61
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:877f0bcf0c036d52f37a9440d6dbbcf358954c36a5f38f0888c780b751b4d00bad4f0edb365b4370b941c3e8f257b9f37e0ef8dcb38c185e7754e6986c3e774b
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access