U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Health Care Provider Knowledge Regarding Oral Contraception Effectiveness for Women with a History of Bariatric Malabsorptive Procedures

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Surg Obes Relat Dis
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background:

    Clinical practice guidelines recommend women avoid pregnancy immediately after bariatric surgery, highlighting the need for effective contraception. However, women with a history of malabsorptive bariatric procedures should generally not use oral contraceptives, as these procedures may decrease contraceptive effectiveness.

    Objectives:

    To identify provider characteristics associated with knowledge of COC effectiveness.

    Setting:

    United States

    Methods:

    We analyzed weighted survey data collected from national samples of public-sector health centers and office-based physicians who regularly provide family planning services (n=2,060). We asked providers about the effectiveness of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for women with a history of malabsorptive procedures compared with healthy women (more/equally effective, less effective, do not know). We used multinomial logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to identify characteristics associated with COC effectiveness knowledge.

    Results:

    Approximately 55% of providers correctly answered that COCs are less effective for women with malabsorptive procedures; 25% considered COCs more/equally effective, and 20% were uncertain. Among public-sector providers, the adjusted odds of uncertainty was significantly higher for those whose clinical focus was not reproductive health, for nurses versus advanced practice clinicians, and for those without Title X funding. For office-based physicians, adolescent medicine providers had higher odds of uncertainty versus obstetrician-gynecologists. Physicians practicing in settings other than private clinics (such as community health centers) had higher odds of considering COCs effective compared with those practicing in hospital or university clinics.

    Conclusions:

    Substantial proportions of surveyed providers have inadequate COC effectiveness knowledge for women with a history of malabsorptive procedures.

  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Surg Obes Relat Dis. 15(8):1355-1361
  • Pubmed ID:
    31311756
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC6721998
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    15
  • Issue:
    8
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:16745795dcc86b61e4db2c68ecfd6ad874baeaa914c577739e9894f4b466de0a
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 92.66 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.