CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i
Cluster Analysis of Vulnerable Groups in Acute TBI Rehabilitation
-
January 06 2018
-
-
Source: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 99(11):2365-2369
Details:
-
Alternative Title:Arch Phys Med Rehabil
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Objective
To analyze the complex relationship between various social indicators that contribute to socioeconomic status and healthcare barriers.
Design
Cluster analysis of historical patient data obtained from inpatient visits.
Setting
Inpatient rehabilitation unit in a large, urban university hospital.
Participants
Adult patients receiving acute inpatient care, predominantly for closed head injury.
Interventions
Not applicable
Main outcome measures
We examined the membership of TBI patients in various “vulnerable group” (VG) clusters (e.g., homeless, unemployed, racial/ethnic minority) and characterized the rehabilitation outcomes of the patients (e.g., duration of stay, changes in Functional Independence Measure [FIM] scores between admission to inpatient stay and discharge).
Results
Analysis revealed four major clusters (i.e., Clusters A-D) separated by VG memberships, with distinct durations of stay and FIM gains during their stay. Cluster B, the largest cluster and also consisting of mostly racial/ethnic minorities, had the shortest duration of hospital stay and one of the lowest FIM improvements among the four clusters despite higher FIM scores at admission. In cluster C, also consisting of mostly ethnic minorities with multiple SES vulnerabilities, patients were characterized by low cognitive FIM scores at admission and the longest duration of stay, and they showed good improvement in FIM scores.
Conclusions
Application of clustering techniques to inpatient data identified distinct clusters of patients who may experience differences in their rehabilitation outcome due to their membership in various “at-risk” groups. Results identified patients (i.e., cluster B, with minority patients and Cluster D, with elderly patients) who attain below-average gains in brain injury rehabilitation. Results also suggested that systemic (e.g., duration of stay) or clinical service improvements (e.g., staff’s language skills, ability to offer substance abuse therapy, provide appropriate referrals or liaise with intensive social work services or plan subacute rehabilitation phase) could be beneficial for acute settings. Stronger recruitment, training and retention initiatives for bilingual and multiethnic professionals may also be considered to optimize gains from acute inpatient rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:
-
Pubmed ID:29317223
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC6581442
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:99
-
Issue:11
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: