Prevalence and consequences of axillary lymph node dissection in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer
Supporting Files
-
1 2018 ; 1-2018
-
Available in CDC Stacks on 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Med Care
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background ; Despite clear guidelines for its use and wide adoption, no population-based study has examined the extent to which patients with early stage breast cancer are benefiting from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by being spared a potentially avoidable axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and its associated morbidity. ; Objective ; Examine variation in type of axillary surgery performed by surgeon volume; investigate the extent and consequences of potentially avoidable ALND. ; Research design/subjects ; Observational study of older women with pathologically node-negative Stage I–II invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery in a SEER state in 2008–2009. ; Measures ; Surgeon annual volume of breast cancer cases and type of axillary surgery were determined by Medicare claims. An estimated probability of excess lymphedema due to ALND was calculated. ; Results ; Among 7,686 pathologically node-negative women, 49% underwent ALND (either initially or after SLNB) and 25% were operated on by low volume surgeons. Even after adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics, women treated by higher volume surgeons were less likely to undergo ALND (medium volume: OR 0.69 95% CI 0.51–0.82; high volume: OR 0.59 95% CI 0.45 – 0.76). Potentially avoidable ALND cases were estimated to represent 21% of all expected lymphedema cases. ; Conclusions ; In this pathologically node-negative population-based breast cancer cohort, only half underwent solely SLNB. Patients treated by low volume surgeons were more likely to undergo ALND. Resources and guidelines on the appropriate training and competency of surgeons to assure the optimal performance of SLNB should be considered to decrease rates of potentially avoidable ALND and lymphedema.
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Med Care. 56(1):78-84
-
Pubmed ID:29087982
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5725235
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:56
-
Issue:1
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:f4a679056162bbbd476901da2338b64b20d25d04fd5c56fdcec313bb3c90655b
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access