Discussion of Average versus Extreme Case Severity in Pandemic Risk Communications
Supporting Files
Public Domain
-
Apr 2017
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Emerg Infect Dis
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:To investigate determinants of the public's perceptions of disease threat, in 2015 we conducted a randomized survey experiment in the Netherlands. Adults who read a mock news article describing average +or extreme outcomes from a hypothetical influenza pandemic were more influenced by average than by extreme case information. Presenting both types of information simultaneously appeared counterproductive.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Emerg Infect Dis. 23(4):706-708.
-
Pubmed ID:28322691
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5367401
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Volume:23
-
Issue:4
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:5d78ecb48f30756e7f3633b92836aae363656ecda29b321e20f54549891920fa
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
Emerging Infectious Diseases