U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Assessing differences in groups randomized by recruitment chain in a respondent-driven sample of Seattle-area injection drug users

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Ann Epidemiol
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Purpose

    Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a form of peer-based study recruitment and analysis that incorporates features designed to limit and adjust for biases in traditional snowball sampling. It is being widely used in studies of hidden populations. We report an empirical evaluation of RDS’s consistency and variability, comparing groups recruited contemporaneously, by identical methods and using identical survey instruments.

    Methods

    We randomized recruitment chains from the RDS-based 2012 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance survey of Seattle-area injection drug users into two groups and compared them in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, drug-associated risk behaviors, sexual risk behaviors, HIV status and HIV testing frequency.

    Results

    The two groups differed in 5 of the 18 variables examined (p ≤ .001): race (for example, 60% white vs. 47%), gender (52% male vs. 67%), area of residence (32% downtown Seattle vs. 44%), an HIV test in the previous 12 months (51% vs. 38%). The difference in serologic HIV status was particularly pronounced (4% positive vs. 18%). In 4 further randomizations, differences in one to five variables attained this level of significance, though the specific variables involved differed.

    Conclusions

    We found some material differences between the randomized groups. While the variability of the present study was less than has been reported in serial RDS surveys, these findings indicate caution in the interpretation of RDS results.

  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Ann Epidemiol. 2014; 24(11):861-867.e14
  • Pubmed ID:
    25277505
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC4252737
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    24
  • Issue:
    11
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:28e7f213849467f87f169bdfb89423cbf5b334da509ca6770b1ea394dfc280bb
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 662.19 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.