Reduction of Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children in North Carolina and Vermont, 1996–1999
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Reduction of Elevated Blood Lead Levels in Children in North Carolina and Vermont, 1996–1999

Filetype[PDF-136.06 KB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Environ Health Perspect
    • Description:

      Few studies have examined factors related to the time required for children’s blood lead levels (BLLs) ≥ 10 μg/dL to decline to < 10 μg/dL.


      We used routinely collected surveillance data to determine the length of time and risk factors associated with reducing elevated BLLs in children below the level of concern of 10 μg/dL.


      From the North Carolina and Vermont state surveillance databases, we identified a retrospective cohort of 996 children < 6 years of age whose first two blood lead tests produced levels ≥ 10 μg/dL during 1996–1999. Data were stratified into five categories of qualifying BLLs and analyzed using Cox regression. Survival curves were used to describe the time until BLLs declined below the level of concern. We compared three different analytic methods to account for children lost to follow-up.


      On average, it required slightly more than 1 year (382 days) for a child’s BLL to decline to < 10 μg/dL, with the highest BLLs taking even longer. The BLLs of black children [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71–0.99], males (HRmale = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71–0.98), and children from rural areas (HRrural = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70–0.97) took longer to fall below 10 μg/dL than those of other children, after controlling for qualifying BLL and other covariates. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that including censored children estimated a longer time for BLL reduction than when using linear interpolation or when excluding censored children.


      Children with high confirmatory BLLs, black children, males, and children from rural areas may need additional attention during case management to expedite their BLL reduction time to < 10 μg/dL. Analytic methods that do not account for loss to follow-up may underestimate the time it takes for BLLs to fall below the recommended target level.

    • Document Type:
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at