Increased Risk of Surgical Site Infection Among Breast-Conserving Surgery Re-Excisions
Supporting Files
-
Oct 31 2014
-
Details
-
Alternative Title:Ann Surg Oncol
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Purpose
To determine the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after primary breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus re-excision among women with carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer.
Methods
We established a retrospective cohort of women aged 18–64 years with ICD-9-CM procedure or CPT-4 codes for BCS from 6/29/2004–12/31/2010. Prior insurance plan enrollment of at least 180 days was required to establish the index BCS; subsequent re-excisions within 180 days were identified. SSIs occurring 2–90 days after BCS were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. The attributable surgery was defined based on SSI onset compared to the BCS date(s). A chi-square test and generalized estimating equations model were used to compare the incidence of SSI after index and re-excision BCS procedures.
Results
23,001 women with 28,827 BCS were identified; 23.2% of women had >1 BCS. The incidence of SSI was 1.82% (418/23,001) for the index BCS and 2.44% (142/5,826) for re-excision BCS (p=0.002). The risk of SSI after re-excision remained significantly higher after accounting for multiple procedures within a woman (odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.68).
Conclusions
Surgeons need to be aware of the increased risk of SSI after re-excision BCS compared to the initial procedure. Our results suggest that risk adjustment of SSI rates for re-excision would allow for better comparison of BCS SSI rates between institutions.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Ann Surg Oncol. 22(6):2003-2009.
-
Pubmed ID:25358666
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC4693603
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:22
-
Issue:6
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:fa681b0b81eee1eb26987055f932c6e8bc0422be414cf4e82063495bd51b2964
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access