Welcome to CDC stacks | Early prognosis of noise-induced hearing loss: Prioritizing prevention over prediction - 34641 | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Early prognosis of noise-induced hearing loss: Prioritizing prevention over prediction
Filetype[PDF-38.83 KB]


No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
  1. The Team document; ten years of leadership advancing the National Occupational Research Agenda
    Corporate Author:
    National Occupational Research Agenda. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
    Published:
    April 2006
    Series:
    DHHS publication ; no. (NIOSH) 2006-121
    Description:
    "This document describes the successes of the teams and reflects on lessons learned during the first decade of NORA. Each NORA research team has described its efforts through a discussion of its priority area, progress made in the last ten years, and...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 4.36 MB]
  2. Using software to predict occupational hearing loss in the mining industry
    Personal Author:
    Azman, A.S.; Li, M.; Thompson, J.K.;
    Published:
    2016
    Source:
    Trans Soc Min Metall Explor Inc. 340:92-99.
    Description:
    Powerful mining systems typically generate high-level noise that can damage the hearing ability of miners. Engineering noise controls are the most desirable and effective control for overexposure to noise. However, the effects of these noise controls...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 801.00 KB]
  3. Letter to the Editor: Scientific Rigor Required for a Re-Examination of Exchange Rate for Occupational Noise Measurements Re: Dobie, R.A., & Clark, W.W. (2014). Exchange Rates for Intermittent and Fluctuating Occupational Noise: A Systematic Review of Studies of Human Permanent Threshold Shift, Ear Hear 35, 86–96
    Personal Author:
    Morata, Thais C.; Themann, Christa L.; Byrne, David C.; Davis, Rickie; Murphy, William J.; Stephenson, Mark R.;
    Published:
    2015 Jul-Aug
    Source:
    Ear Hear. 36(4):488-491.
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 63.67 KB]
  4. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions
    Personal Author:
    Murphy, William J.; Flamme, Gregory A.; Meinke, Deanna K.; Sondergaard, Jacob; Finan, Donald S.; Lankford, James E.; Khan, Amir; Vernon, Julia; Stewart, Michael;
    Published:
    Dec 19 2011
    Source:
    Int J Audiol. 51(0 1):S31-S42.
    Description:
    Objective : In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed an impulse noise reduction rating (NRR) for hearing protection devices based upon the impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) methods in the ANSI S12.42-2010 standard. This study...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.66 MB]
  5. In-depth survey report : field-testing NIOSH HPD well-fit: off-shore oil rig inspectors in Texas & Louisiana
    Personal Author:
    Murphy, William J.; Themann, Christa L.; Murata, Taichi K.;
    Corporate Author:
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Engineering and Physical Hazards Branch.
    Published:
    July 2015
    Description:
    "Historically, employers have been reluctant to institute hearing protection device (HPD) fit-testing due to a number of limitations. HPD fit testing is not required by regulations. Previous HPD fit test systems required unique hardware and software....
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.89 MB]