Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography

Details

• Journal Article:
  Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD)
• Personal Author:
  Hoffman, Richard M. ; Sussman, Andrew L. ; Getrich, Christina M. ; Rhyne, Robert L. ; Crowell, Richard E. ; Taylor, Kathryn L. ; Reifler, Ellen J. ; Wescott, Pamela H. ; Murrietta, Ambroshia M. ; Saeed, Ali I. ; Mishra, Shiraz I.
  More +
• Description:
  Introduction ; On the basis of results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), national guidelines now recommend using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen high-risk smokers for lung cancer. Our study objective was to characterize the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of primary care providers about implementing LDCT screening. ; Methods ; We conducted semi structured interviews with primary care providers practicing in New Mexico clinics for underserved minority populations. The interviews, conducted from February through September 2014, focused on providers’ tobacco cessation efforts, lung cancer screening practices, perceptions of NLST and screening guidelines, and attitudes about informed decision making for cancer screening. Investigators iteratively reviewed transcripts to create a coding structure. ; Results ; We reached thematic saturation after interviewing 10 providers practicing in 6 urban and 4 rural settings; 8 practiced at federally qualified health centers. All 10 providers promoted smoking cessation, some screened with chest x-rays, and none screened with LDCT. Not all were aware of NLST results or current guideline recommendations. Providers viewed study results skeptically, particularly the 95% false-positive rate, the need to screen 320 patients to prevent 1 lung cancer death, and the small proportion of minority participants. Providers were uncertain whether New Mexico had the necessary infrastructure to support high-quality screening, and worried about access barriers and financial burdens for rural, underinsured populations. Providers noted the complexity of discussing benefits and harms of screening and surveillance with their patient population. ; Conclusion ; Providers have several concerns about the feasibility and appropriateness of implementing LDCT screening. Effective lung cancer screening programs will need to educate providers and patients to support informed decision making and to ensure that high-quality screening can be efficiently delivered in community practice.
• Subjects:
  • Original Research
  • Directive Counseling
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Health Plan Implementation
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Lung Neoplasms
  More +
• Source:
  Prev Chronic Dis. 12.
• DOI:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150112
• ISSN:
  1545-1151
• Pubmed ID:
  26160294
• Pubmed Central ID:
  PMC4509091
• Document Type:
  Journal Article
• Funding:
  U48DP001931-05S1/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
• Place as Subject:
  New Mexico
• Location:
  North America
• Volume:
  12
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/32389/cdc_32389_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 340.98 KB]
• Collection(s):
  Preventing Chronic Disease
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:6d91a8a280552696eb86d91fa9877f6ed06afb93605667f8aba845167a3b11d6f8384719317b7db354ff54e7780a7857b3c499244b86d0b1f8723acadc5a2730