U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Expert Assessment of Chemical Exposures of Incident Cases of Work-Related Asthma



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background: Environmental sampling at the workplace is not usually feasible in studies involving a large variety of workplaces. Aim: To develop a semi-quantitative coding procedure for assessing occupational exposures in a population of workers suspected of work-related asthma (WRA). Methods: An occupational questionnaire was administered to each incident case of WRA in a prospective cohort study. It included questions regarding employer and employment. An occupational hygienist (DB} carried out for each job the coding of potential exposures from a pre-established fist of 45 substances within five generic categories (organic aerosols, combustion fumes. gases and mists. inorganic dusts. organic chemicals). Coding was carried out in a semi-quantitative way for concentration in workplace air, frequency and reliability of exposure. Exposure was assigned as low or substantial according to the combination of these indices. Information sources included the questionnaire. technical and material safety data sheets of the substances handled, the industrial chemistry and occupational hygiene literature, several data bases and Web sites. Results: One hundred and twenty jobs were coded, mainly in manufacturing industries, for a total of 554 assigned exposures covering 45 families of substances. The 10 exposures most often coded were (any level, substantial level, as % of total jobs): solvents (43.0,32.5), cleaning agents (29.22.5), pesticides. fungicides and biocides (20, 1.6), acids (17.5, 0.8) ammonia (15.8,0), metals (18.3. 3), metallic fumes (20, 5.8), woods (18.3, 12.5). paints (15.0, 5.8). and formaldehyde (14.2, 1.6). Conclusion: The expert coding method identified a large variety of exposures at different levels. It can be a useful alternative to environmental sampling in studies involving a large number of workplaces. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    1073-449X
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • CIO:
  • Topic:
  • Location:
  • Volume:
    179
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:20059292
  • Citation:
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009 Apr; 179(Meeting Abstracts):A3669
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    2009
  • Performing Organization:
    Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
  • Peer Reviewed:
    False
  • Start Date:
    20050901
  • Source Full Name:
    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Supplement:
    Meeting Abstracts
  • End Date:
    20110831
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:a3d1da4f1f331e1b36bb6b3a6f424b6f294da3c1ac37689d3a47d941b5c712d35e9cc62a65975bb75e193bc568863cef38f5ec462b20630d5b22be555fa674ed
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 249.08 KB ]
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.