U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Risk-Factor Based Lead Screening and Correlation with Blood Lead Levels in Pregnancy



Details

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Objectives: Lead exposure has devastating neurologic consequences for children and may begin in utero. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends prenatal lead screening using a risk factor-based approach rather than universal blood testing. The clinical utility of this approach has not been studied. We evaluated a risk-factor based questionnaire to detect elevated blood lead levels in pregnancy. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cohort of parturients enrolled to evaluate the association of lead with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. We included participants in this analysis if they had a singleton pregnancy ≥ 34 weeks' gestation with blood lead levels recorded. Participants completed a lead risk factor survey modified for pregnancy. We defined elevated blood lead as ≥ 2 µg/dL, as this was the clinically reportable level. Results: Of 102 participants enrolled in the cohort, 92 had blood lead measured as part of the study. The vast majority (78%) had 1 or more risk factor for elevated lead using the questionnaire yet none had clinical blood lead testing during routine visits. Only two participants (2.2%) had elevated blood lead levels. The questionnaire had high sensitivity but poor specificity for predicting detectable lead levels (sensitivity 100%, specificity 22%). Conclusions for practice: Prenatal risk-factor based lead screening appears underutilized in practice and does not adequately discriminate between those with and without elevated blood levels. Given the complexity of the risk factor-based approach and underutilization, the benefit and cost-effectiveness of universal lead testing should be further explored. [Description provided by NIOSH]
  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • ISSN:
    1092-7875
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Genre:
  • Place as Subject:
  • CIO:
  • Topic:
  • Location:
  • Pages in Document:
    185-192
  • Volume:
    26
  • Issue:
    1
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    nn:20064357
  • Citation:
    Matern Child Health J 2022 Jan; 26(1):185-192
  • Contact Point Address:
    Katherine M. Johnson, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School/University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
  • Email:
    katherine.johnson@umassmemorial.org
  • CAS Registry Number:
  • Federal Fiscal Year:
    2022
  • Performing Organization:
    Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Peer Reviewed:
    True
  • Start Date:
    20190901
  • Source Full Name:
    Maternal and Child Health Journal
  • End Date:
    20220831
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:954a6f36248a5846f3078e0d8cdcc81a8ef8b651b07485ffbe0870522117ab4ff89fdabdc6845df056f19187c5b600c8327c3eb477cb613e3a79af6eb5b220d7
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 2.64 MB ]
ON THIS PAGE
 Was this page helpful?
 Found an issue?
Send us an email at:
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.