Issues in Training Emergency Responders: Is Preparation for Terrorism Different from Training for “Ordinary” Disasters?
Public Domain
-
2003/10/28
-
-
Series: Mining Publications
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Terrorist incidents using weapons of mass destruction (WMD) feel overwhelming--both to the victims and to the professionals who provide emergency and other services in response to such incidents. If the WMD agent is unknown or undetectable (i.e., by the senses, as in radiation), there can be extreme fear and dread. With such overwhelming emotional responses likely, how can we expect responders to be able to reliably make the time-critical decisions necessary to complete a rescue or other tasks and minimize personal and crew exposure to the hazards? More specifically, how can we prepare responders to maintain emotional balance and good decision-making in this type of environment? The broader question is: should terrorist incidents be viewed as categorically distinct and separate from other workplace emergencies and hazards, or should they be treated as occupying the extreme end of a series of dimensions along which natural disasters, routine emergencies, and other hazardous environments may vary? Our hypothesis is that we can characterize the differences between these events along several dimensions, including (1) the specific type(s) and severity of the hazard(s) present, including (a) unknown versus known degree and type of exposure(s), and (b) involuntary versus voluntary nature of the exposure(s); (2) the speed and complexity of responses that are demanded of workers; (3) the risks for injury, including uncommon (rare) versus common (everyday) risks associated with exposure(s); and (4) severity of the consequences of exposure(s), including the potential for traumatic incident stress that may result. The key test is to identify analogous, but more common and less extreme, "routine" or "ordinary" hazards that may help prepare workers for a WMD or terrorist event. Then, existing training for various types of emergencies, including chemical, biological, and radiation hazards, can be extended to help prepare for the magnitude of a mass casualty incident. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Series:
-
Publisher:
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:47
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20023704
-
Citation:NOIRS 2003: Abstracts of the National Occupational Injury Research Symposium, October 28-30, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh, PA: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2003 Oct; :47
-
Contact Point Address:NIOSH Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2004
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Source Full Name:NOIRS 2003: Abstracts of the National Occupational Injury Research Symposium, October 28-30, 2003, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
-
End Date:20030930
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:c5ad732b264054544cf3019862458de84e2078b3b5dc99725d654d1a4e967b3faa717b3059bb957903fd65568d67997356071e62d51028d5a0e837fcf10e3ad2
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like