Prevalence of Mild and Severe Cognitive Impairment in World Trade Center Exposed Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) and General Emergency Responders
-
2025/02/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Armstrong MP ; Barber A ; Carr MM ; Choi J ; Chow K ; Christodoulou C ; Clouston SAP ; Fels AM ; Fontana AE ; Hall CB ; Hennington CM ; Kroll CH ; Luft BJ ; Mann FD ; Melendez OA ; Mueller AK ; Prezant DJ ; Smith AJ ; Zieg-Owens R
-
Description:Background: The emergency personnel who responded to the World Trade Center (WTC) attacks endured severe occupational exposures, yet the prevalence of cognitive impairment remains unknown among WTC-exposed-FDNY-responders. The present study screened for mild and severe cognitive impairment in WTC-exposed FDNY responders using objective tests, compared prevalence rates to a cohort of non-FDNY WTC-exposed responders, and descriptively to meta-analytic estimates of MCI from global, community, and clinical populations. Methods: A sample of WTC-exposed-FDNY responders (n = 343) was recruited to complete an extensive battery of cognitive, psychological, and physical tests. The prevalences of domain-specific impairments were estimated based on the results of norm-referenced tests, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Jak/Bondi criteria, Petersen criteria, and the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria were used to diagnose MCI. NIA-AA criteria were also used to diagnose severe cognitive impairment. Generalized linear models and propensity score matching were used to compare prevalence estimates of cognitive impairment to a large sample of WTC-exposed-non-FDNY responders from the General Responder Cohort (GRC; n = 7102) who completed the MoCA during a similar time frame. Result: Among FDNY responders under 65 years, the unadjusted prevalence of MCI varied from 52.57% to 60.32% depending on the operational definition of MCI, apart from using a conservative cut-off applied to MoCA total scores (18 < MoCA < 23), which yielded a markedly lower crude prevalence (24.31%) compared to alternative criteria. Using propensity score matching, the prevalence of MCI was significantly higher among WTC-exposed FDNY responders, compared to WTC-exposed GRC responders (adjusted RR = 1.13 (CI 95% = 1.07-1.20, p < 0.001), and descriptively higher than meta-analytic estimates from different global, community, and clinical populations. Following NIA-AA diagnostic guidelines, 4.96% of WTC-exposed-FDNY-responders met the criteria for severe impairments (95% CI = 2.91-7.82), a prevalence that remained largely unchanged after excluding responders over the age of 65 years. Discussion: There is a high prevalence of mild and severe cognitive impairment among WTC-responders, highlighting the putative role of occupational, environmental, and disaster-related exposures in the etiology of accelerated cognitive decline. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0271-3586
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:160-174
-
Volume:68
-
Issue:2
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20070415
-
Citation:Am J Ind Med 2025 Feb; 68(2):160-174
-
Contact Point Address:Sean A. P. Clouston, Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Program in Public Health, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
-
Email:sean.clouston@stonybrookmedicine.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2025
-
Performing Organization:State University of New York at Stony Brook
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20210701
-
Source Full Name:American Journal of Industrial Medicine
-
End Date:20260630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:f09dba44e3af1d9d417074f648d504ceed9516ec415350953752c825fdb93df3774f788eb0b78f7e7c1e7001d2c638162c7e82390c174d663687de2616ab2fa4
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like