Inadequate Personal Protective Equipment Factors and Odds Related to Acute Pesticide Poisoning: A Meta-Analysis Report
-
2024/03/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Introduction: Acute pesticide poisoning (APP) continues to affect farm workers, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The dose-response relationship between exposure and APP is well-researched, but pesticide exposure assessment in a practical environment is difficult to perform, considering various work practices and protections in place. It is well known that inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE) use is a risk factor of APP. However, it is unknown which types of inadequate PPE use, such as face or other types of general protection, are most harmful. Methods: This study aimed to identify if inadequate PPE use is an indicator of APP risk following established specifications for meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Included studies reported an odds ratio (OR) between PPE use to APP in agricultural workers. Data extracted from selected articles included authors, publication year, country of origin, farm type, population size, method of data collection and time frame of reported symptoms, job task, type of PPE and pesticides used, adjustments made in analysis, OR for APP, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, where ORs were pooled to assess an overall estimate for poisoning odds. Results: Our findings suggested that inadequate PPE use was associated with increased odds (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.16-2.12) of having APP. Failure to use general protection and inadequate face protection increased odds of APP by 1.29 times (95% CI = 0.88-1.90) and 1.92 times (95% CI = 1.23-3.00), respectively. Conclusions: The meta-analysis results indicate that improper facial protection and general protection are not differently associated with APP odds. Our study concludes that more robust protection against inhalation and dermal contact are critical because any gaps in comprehensive full-body PPE would put workers and exposed populations at APP risk. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:21
-
Issue:3
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20069448
-
Citation:Int J Environ Res Public Health 2024 Mar; 21(3):257
-
Contact Point Address:Candace S. J. Tsai, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095
-
Email:candacetsai@ucla.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2024
-
Performing Organization:University of California Los Angeles
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
End Date:20270630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:a265710d2c9acf6ed10e96a6ab7a7f71047634ef0fa554ae28d165aa6d5a48e17259e3b476b61943792a2fe13c3676bec7f7167e40a0a8be345617e3222f4cad
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like