Dioxin and mortality from cancer
Public Domain
-
1991/06/20
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Several researchers had responded in these letters to the editor to an article by Fingerhut et al. dealing with the risk of cancer in humans following exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1746016) (TCDD). G. L. Carlo, and K. G. Sung suggest that a earlier study addressed high levels of occupational exposures to dioxin and found no conclusive evidence of cancer risk elevation at these levels. They suggest that dioxin may not be as dangerous a substance as once feared and that exposure to low background levels may not be dangerous at all. R. W. Morgan considers the earlier study to be limited partly by the small size of the cohort. L. Hardell, M. Eriksson, O. Axelson, and M. Fredriksson support the reference study with data of their own and strongly suggest that these findings provide the needed data to conclude that TCDD is a human carcinogen, at least in regard to soft tissue sarcoma. L. R. Goldman, D. Hayward, D. M. Siegel, and R. D. Stephens suggest that the numbers used in the Fingerhut study support the numbers used by the EPA to regulate dioxin exposure. However, they do not support a conclusion that dioxins are less carcinogenic to humans than to animals. In response to these various criticisms, Fingerhut et al. reiterate that the high exposure group had a 46% excess of all cancers combined, that TCDD has produced cancers at a number of sites in animal studies, and that their study provided more than the usual estimate of exposure as they reviewed the chemical processes used, because substantial information was available in the work history records, and because of the very long half life of TCDD biological measurements that could be made long after exposure. J. C. Bailar III supported the view that the evidence indicates a real risk. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0028-4793
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:324
-
Issue:25
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:00201166
-
Citation:N Engl J Med 1991 Jun; 324(25):1809-1812
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:1991
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Source Full Name:New England Journal of Medicine
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:8a503033a4362f20156614d7010bae78c5272fdb8ca25f5415d64ba06cb1b317a4cabeaa862e4bd2e4bd8eab5658fe4afc5f1b95f8eb7a51f1ea056fb8e5c170
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like