Effects of varying case definition on carpal tunnel syndrome prevalence estimates in a pooled cohort
-
2014/12/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Bao S ; Burt, Susan E. ; Dale, Ann M. ; Eisen EA ; Evanoff B ; Garg, Arun ; Gerr F ; Harris-Adamson C ; Hegmann KT ; Kapellusch J ; Merlino L ; Rempel D ; Silverstein B ; Thiese MS
-
Description:OBJECTIVE: To analyze differences in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) prevalence using a combination of electrodiagnostic studies (EDSs) and symptoms using EDS criteria varied across a range of cutpoints and compared with symptoms in both =1 and =2 median nerve-served digits. DESIGN: Pooled data from 5 prospective cohorts. SETTING: Hand-intensive industrial settings, including manufacturing, assembly, production, service, construction, and health care. PARTICIPANTS: Employed, working-age participants who are able to provide consent and undergo EDS testing (N=3130). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CTS prevalence was estimated while varying the thresholds for median sensory latency, median motor latency, and transcarpal delta latency difference. EDS criteria examined included the following: median sensory latency of 3.3 to 4.1 milliseconds, median motor latency of 4.1 to 4.9 milliseconds, and median-ulnar sensory difference of 0.4 to 1.2 milliseconds. EDS criteria were combined with symptoms in =1 or =2 median nerve-served digits. EDS criteria from other published studies were applied to allow for comparison. RESULTS: CTS prevalence ranged from 6.3% to 11.7%. CTS prevalence estimates changed most per millisecond of sensory latency compared with motor latency or transcarpal delta. CTS prevalence decreased by 0.9% to 2.0% if the criteria required symptoms in 2 digits instead of 1. CONCLUSIONS: There are meaningful differences in CTS prevalence when different EDS criteria are applied. The digital sensory latency criteria result in the largest variance in prevalence. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0003-9993
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:California ; Iowa ; Missouri ; Ohio ; OSHA Region 10 ; OSHA Region 5 ; OSHA Region 7 ; OSHA Region 8 ; OSHA Region 9 ; Utah ; Washington ; Wisconsin
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:95
-
Issue:12
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20045506
-
Citation:Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014 Dec; 95(12):2320-2326
-
Contact Point Address:Matthew S. Thiese, PhD, MSPH, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah, 391Chipeta Way, Ste C, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
-
Email:matt.thiese@hsc.utah.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2015
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Performing Organization:University of California-San Francisco
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20100901
-
Source Full Name:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
-
End Date:20140831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:b785e3f9b9109204b1e19afb826c7d5052ea01e1516dffb548f8f59410049c4258d47e9a4ff7b8e2268a770f68bcbd49c4ab40e75098805dc3ec994ae774e240
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like