Investigation of cut-off sizes and collection efficiencies of portable microbial samplers
-
2006/08/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:This research investigated the physical collection efficiencies and cut-off sizes of SMA MicroPortable, BioCulture, Microflow, Microbiological Air Sampler (MAS-100), Millipore Air Tester (MAT), SAS Super 180, and RCS High Flow portable microbial samplers when collecting Polystyrene Latex particles ranging from 0.5 to 9.8 um in aerodynamic size. Traditional collection efficiency measurements often directly compare particle concentrations upstream and downstream of the sampler without considering the particle losses. Here, we developed a new approach which tests collection efficiencies of the sampler with and without agar collection plate loaded. This method thus allows estimating the effective collection efficiency, i.e., the fraction of incoming particles deposited onto the agar collection medium only. The experimental cut-off sizes, or d50, of the investigated samplers ranged from 1.2 um for the RCS High Flow, 1.7 um for the MAS-100, 2.1 um for SAS Super 180, to 2.3 um forMAT; for other three samplers they were close to or above 5 um. In most cases the theoretical d50 was lower than the experimental value, which was likely due to the dissipation of impactor jets and the influence of cross-flow in the multi-nozzle impactors. For most samplers, we observed a notable difference between the collection efficiency obtained by the traditional measurement method and the effective collection efficiency. In general, all samplers collected 10% or less of 0.5 um particles onto the agar medium. This study indicates that the use of most of the tested bioaerosol samplers may result in a substantial underestimation of bacterial concentrations, especially of single bacterial cells with diameter 0.5-1.0 um. On the other hand, most of the investigated samplers would be more efficient when collecting larger fungal spores. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0278-6826
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:40
-
Issue:8
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20044414
-
Citation:Aerosol Sci Technol 2006 Aug; 40(8):595-606
-
Email:mainelis@envsci.rutgers.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2006
-
Performing Organization:Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20040901
-
Source Full Name:Aerosol Science and Technology
-
End Date:20080831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:67b3e0e1cfcc26bd813cee66649543ab9b509ce0b5892bf42e2aff6afbb3402b0feffa3bd2d1714fa92466d4d71f323a0a69260dae3d7ed9bfbe90d6cbe28d5a
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like