Short-Term Monitoring of Formaldehyde: Comparison of Two Direct-Reading Instruments to a Laboratory-Based Method
Public Domain
-
2011/06/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Airborne formaldehyde concentrations can be measured using several different techniques, including laboratory-based methods and direct-reading instruments. Two commercially available direct-reading instruments, an RKI Instruments Model FP-30 and a PPM Technology Formaldemeter htV, were compared with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Method 2016 in different test environments to determine if these direct-reading instruments can provide comparable results. The methods yielded the following mean concentrations for 47 samples: NIOSH Method 2016, 0.37 ppm; FP-30, 0.29 ppm; and htV, 0.34 ppm. Results from both of the direct-reading instruments were correlated with the laboratory-based method (R2 = 0.78 for FP-30, and 0.902 for htV). Comparison of the means of the three methods showed that on average the FP-30 instrument (p < 0.001) differed statistically from NIOSH Method 2016, whereas the htV (p = 0.15) was not statistically different from the NIOSH method. Sensitivity and specificity tests demonstrated that the FP-30 had sensitivity above 60% to detect formaldehyde concentrations at all the cutoff levels tested, whereas the htV appeared to have greater sensitivity above 88% for the levels evaluated. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1545-9624
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:357-363
-
Volume:8
-
Issue:6
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20038802
-
Citation:J Occup Environ Hyg 2011 Jun; 8(6):357-363
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2011
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:cfcd913cb99e364c4d002dc3cb099d000ad090fbb7b02f8fcfe4f66deca98c5dd0759075871bbd29a1664abac369ab82b6d733e19fd0e26d5a7813f226fa23e7
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like