A Performance Assessment of Airborne Infection Isolation Rooms
Peer Reviewed
-
2007/06/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Background: Airborne infection isolation rooms (AIIRs) help prevent the spread of infectious agents in hospitals. The performance of 678 AIIRs was evaluated and compared with construction design guidelines. Methods: The pressure differentials (DP) between the isolation rooms and adjacent areas were measured, and ventilation and construction details were recorded for each room. Ultrafine particle concentrations were evaluated in the rooms, surrounding areas, and ventilation systems serving the rooms. Measurements were analyzed as a function of room parameters. Results: Only 32% of the isolation rooms achieved the recommended DP of 22.5 Pascals (Pa) relative to surrounding areas. AIIRs with solid ceilings had an average DP of 24.4 Pa, which was significantly higher than the average DP of 22.0 Pa for rooms with dropped ceilings (P 5 .0002). Isolation room ultrafine particle concentrations were more highly correlated with particle levels in surrounding areas (R2 5 0.817) than in the ventilation systems serving the rooms (R2 5 0.441). Almost all ventilation filters serving AIIRs collected fewer particles than anticipated. Conclusion: The results indicate that hospitals are not all maintaining AIIRs to correspond with current guidelines. The findings also support the contention that having tightly sealed rooms helps maintain appropriate pressure differentials. Description provided by NIOSH
-
Subjects:
- Air Pollutants, Occupational
- Construction Industry
- Construction Materials
- Environmental Health
- Environmental Monitoring
- Hazardous Substances
- Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services
- Inhalation Exposure
- Lung
- Occupational Health
- Particulate Matter
- Personal Protective Equipment
- Respiratory System
- Risk Assessment
- Risk Factors
- Safety
- Urogenital System
- Workplace
-
Keywords:
- Airborne-particles
- Biohazards
- Biological-effects
- Construction
- Construction-materials
- Control-technology
- Environmental-factors
- Exposure-assessment
- Exposure-levels
- Exposure-methods
- Health-care-facilities
- Inhalants
- Inhalation-studies
- Lung-irritants
- Mathematical-models
- Medical-facilities
- Particle-aerodynamics
- Particulates
- Particulate-sampling-methods
- Physiological-effects
- Pollutants
- Protective-measures
- Quantitative-analysis
- Reproductive-system
- Risk-analysis
- Risk-factors
- Statistical-analysis
- Work-environment
-
ISSN:0196-6553
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:324-331
-
Volume:35
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20037371
-
Citation:Am J Infect Control 2007 Jun; 35(5):324-331
-
Contact Point Address:Peter C. Raynor, PhD, MSEE, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Mayo MC 807, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
-
Email:praynor@umn.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2007
-
Performing Organization:University of Minnesota Twin Cities
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:American Journal of Infection Control
-
End Date:20250630
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:fcbf1d7b307705d381f910a79eb644e51c000454488a9284463467c488be1143bd43a8d388e9132a940789305fd1b0435291c4dbb5e2ac45780e9311969d5e4f
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like