A comparative study of aerosol deposition in different lung models.
-
1982/01/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Lung models for the study of aerosol deposition are compared. Various previously reported lung models were compared by sealing their original data to an initial lung volume of 3000 cubic centimeters. Airway diameters, number of airways, the cumulative volume versus airway generation, and the cross sectional area versus the distance from the trachea were compared and a mathematical model examined deposition patterns. Total deposition did not vary appreciably from model to model while large differences existed in regional deposition. Deposition profiles along the airways from different models also showed different patterns. The authors state that the differences in deposition from various lung models may be explained by differences in airway dimensions and the number of structures in the various models possibly reflecting intersubject variability in human lung morphology. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0002-8894
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:54-65
-
Volume:43
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:00122987
-
Citation:Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1982 Jan; 43(1):54-65
-
Contact Point Address:Engineering Science S U N Y - at Buffalo Dept of Engineering Science Buffalo, N Y 14214
-
Federal Fiscal Year:1982
-
Performing Organization:State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:19791201
-
Source Full Name:American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
-
End Date:19861130
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:a1ce68726b45e9bd9dffd537bbe04311cd4011b936d3e313de702d73db035e3ce5c79e117be6aea26928c37e24f98cc58201c155de6f607bfe24bac5cd292f86
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like