Costs of Identifying Cases of Syphilis Using Rapid Syphilis Tests in Multiple Non-Clinical Settings in the U.S.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Costs of Identifying Cases of Syphilis Using Rapid Syphilis Tests in Multiple Non-Clinical Settings in the U.S.

Filetype[PDF-297.20 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Sex Transm Dis
    • Description:
      Background:

      Outreach screening is a common strategy for detecting cases of syphilis in high-risk populations. New rapid syphilis tests allow for quicker response times and may alter the costs of detecting and treating syphilis in non-clinical settings.

      Methods:

      Between May and October of 2017, we collected detailed retrospective cost data from two outreach screening programs engaging people experiencing homelessness and LGBTQ populations. Comprehensive and retrospective cost information, disaggregated by cost category, programmatic activity, and source of support, was collected during and after the testing period.

      Results:

      Across all sites, rapid syphilis tests were conducted on 595 people at an average cost of $213 per person. Twenty-three cases of syphilis were confirmed and treated for an average cost of $5,517 per case, ranging from $3,604 at a rehabilitation facility to $13,140 at LGBTQ venues served by a mobile clinic. Personnel contributed the most to total costs (56.4%), followed by supplies (12.8%) and the use of buildings (10.4%). Expenditures by programmatic activity varied substantially across sites.

      Conclusions:

      Testing costs varied between venues, reflecting differences in the models used and intensity of services provided. While staff costs are the major driver, buildings and supplies costs are also significant. Our findings suggest that outreach screenings using rapid syphilis tests may be a feasible and cost-effective tool for health departments when targeting known high-prevalence areas and hard to reach populations.

    • Pubmed ID:
      33993158
    • Pubmed Central ID:
      PMC10964737
    • Document Type:
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov