Welcome to CDC Stacks | Comparison of two vision-testing devices - 12903 | Stephen B. Thacker CDC Library collection
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Comparison of two vision-testing devices
  • Published Date:
    June 1963
Filetype[PDF - 2.90 MB]


  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
  1. A Performance evaluation of two overhead power line proximity warning devices
    Personal Author:
    Homce, Gerald T.; Cawley, James C.; Yenchek, M. R. (Michael R.);
    Corporate Author:
    Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health;
    Published:
    November 2008
    Series:
    Information circular (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) ; IC 9510
    DHHS publication ; no. (NIOSH) 2009-110
    Description:
    Accidental contact of overhead electrical power lines by mobile equipment is a leading cause of occupational fatalities in the United States, accounting for 20% of on-the-job electrocutions. Overhead electrical power line proximity warning devices (P...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 24.15 MB]
  2. A Performance Evaluation of Two Overhead Power Line Proximity Warning Devices - Executive Summary
    Personal Author:
    Homce, Gerald T.; Cawley, James C.; Yenchek, Michael R.;
    Published:
    1/1/2008
    Description:
    Accidental contact of overhead electrical power lines by mobile equipment is a leading cause of occupational fatalities in the United States, accounting for 20% of on-the-job electrocutions. Overhead electrical power line proximity warning devices (P...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.32 MB]
  3. A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios
    Personal Author:
    Petersen, Martin R; Deddens, James A;
    Published:
    Feb 28 2008
    Source:
    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8:9.
    Description:
    Background : It is usually preferable to model and estimate prevalence ratios instead of odds ratios in cross-sectional studies when diseases or injuries are not rare. Problems with existing methods of modeling prevalence ratios include lack of conve...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 259.00 KB]
  4. Comparison of Two Health-Promotion Programs for Older Workers
    Personal Author:
    Hughes, Susan L.; Seymour, Rachel B.; Campbell, Richard T.; Shaw, James W.; Fabiyi, Camille; Sokas, Rosemary;
    Published:
    Mar 18 2011
    Source:
    Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(5):883-890.
    Description:
    Objectives : We examined the effects of 2 worksite health-promotion interventions (compared with a health-education control) on older workers’ healthy behaviors and health outcomes. : Methods : We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled tria...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 92.71 KB]
  5. Comparison of Two Sepsis Recognition Methods in a Pediatric Emergency Department
    Personal Author:
    Balamuth, Fran; Alpern, Elizabeth R.; Grundmeier, Robert W.; Chilutti, Marianne; Weiss, Scott L.; Fitzgerald, Julie C.; Hayes, Katie; Bilker, Warren; Lautenbach, Ebbing;
    Published:
    Oct 16 2015
    Source:
    Acad Emerg Med. 22(11):1298-1306.
    Description:
    Objectives : To compare the effectiveness of physician judgment and an electronic algorithmic alert to identify pediatric patients with severe sepsis/septic shock in a pediatric emergency department (ED). : Methods : This was an observational cohort ...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 296.80 KB]