Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults
Supporting Files
-
5 15 2018
-
Available in CDC Stacks on 2021-12-08T00:00:00Z
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:J Am Coll Cardiol
-
Personal Author:Reboussin, David M. ; Allen, Norrina B. ; Griswold, Michael E. ; Guallar, Eliseo ; Hong, Yuling ; Lackland, Daniel T. ; Miller, Edgar (Pete) R. ; Polonsky, Tamar ; Thompson-Paul, Angela M. ; Vupputuri, Suma ; Levine, Glenn N. ; O’Gara, Patrick T. ; Halperin, Jonathan L. ; Al-Khatib, Sana M. ; Beckman, Joshua A. ; Birtcher, Kim K. ; Bozkurt, Biykem ; Brindis, Ralph G. ; Cigarroa, Joaquin E. ; Curtis, Lesley H. ; Deswal, Anita ; Fleisher, Lee A. ; Gentile, Federico ; Gidding, Samuel ; Goldberger, Zachary D. ; Hlatky, Mark A. ; Ikonomidis, John ; Joglar, José A. ; Mauri, Laura ; Pressler, Susan J. ; Riegel, Barbara ; Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
-
Description:OBJECTIVE ; To review the literature systematically and perform meta-analyses to address these questions: 1) Is there evidence that self-measured blood pressure (BP) without other augmentation is superior to office-based measurement of BP for achieving better BP control or for preventing adverse clinical outcomes that are related to elevated BP? 2) What is the optimal target for BP lowering during antihypertensive therapy in adults? 3) In adults with hypertension, how do various antihypertensive drug classes differ in their benefits and harms compared with each other as first-line therapy? ; METHODS ; Electronic literature searches were performed by Doctor Evidence, a global medical evidence software and services company, across PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to 2015 using key words and relevant subject headings for randomized controlled trials that met eligibility criteria defined for each question. We performed analyses using traditional frequentist statistical and Bayesian approaches, including random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses. ; RESULTS ; Our results suggest that: 1) There is a modest but significant improvement in systolic BP in randomized controlled trials of self-measured BP versus usual care at 6 but not 12 months, and for selected patients and their providers self-measured BP may be a helpful adjunct to routine office care. 2) systolic BP lowering to a target of <130 mm Hg may reduce the risk of several important outcomes including risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and major cardiovascular events. No class of medications (i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, or beta blockers) was significantly better than thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics as a first-line therapy for any outcome.
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:J Am Coll Cardiol. 71(19):2176-2198
-
Pubmed ID:29146534
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC8654280
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Corporate as Subject:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Volume:71
-
Issue:19
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:59a09e094b3b06cbec9aafdf699a2b91bb35d8a2b424bf47a723ef3852f1ccea
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access