Evaluating Differences in Whole Blood, Serum, and Urine Screening Tests for Zika Virus, Puerto Rico, USA, 2016
Supporting Files
Public Domain
-
May 2021
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Emerg Infect Dis
-
Personal Author:Rosinger, Asher Y. ; Olson, Samantha M. ; Ellington, Sascha R. ; Perez-Padilla, Janice ; Simeone, Regina M. ; Pedati, Caitlin S. ; Schroeder, Betsy A. ; Santiago, Gilberto A. ; Medina, Freddy A. ; Muñoz-Jordán, Jorge L. ; Adams, Laura E. ; Galang, Romeo R. ; Valencia-Prado, Miguel ; Bakkour, Sonia ; Colón, Candimar ; Goodwin, Mary ; Meaney-Delman, Dana ; Read, Jennifer S. ; Petersen, Lyle R. ; Jamieson, Denise J. ; Deseda, Carmen C. ; Honein, Margaret A. ; Rivera-García, Brenda ; Shapiro-Mendoza, Carrie K.
-
Description:We evaluated nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Zika virus on whole-blood specimens compared with NAAT on serum and urine specimens among asymptomatic pregnant women during the 2015-2016 Puerto Rico Zika outbreak. Using NAAT, more infections were detected in serum and urine than in whole blood specimens.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Emerg Infect Dis. 27(5):1505-1508
-
Pubmed ID:33900183
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC8084515
-
Document Type:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Volume:27
-
Issue:5
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:08fa6dfc02ec91c91efb06945692bc5132e453f5431481bf9103336b74ace913
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
Emerging Infectious Diseases