Details:

Personal Author:
Barczark, T. M. ; Tadolini, S. C. ;
Barczark, T. M. ; Tadolini, S. C. ; Less -
Description:
Mines in the western United States have had limited choices for standing support. Wood cribs were often too soft and unstable. The introduction of the Can support in the earl v 1990s provided an effective alternative, (lilt/ it remains the dominant form of tail¬gate support. Water-filled prestressing cells are now used to cap the Can and preload it to provide an active roof load. The Cluster Prop, consisting of three timber wedge props bundled to¬gether; provides more capacity than (m equivalent sized Call support and improves transport efficiency. However the Cluster Prop is less stable and does not maintain a consistent load throughout its loading profile. Pumpable roof supports are another alternative support, but the \' have not been proven in high deformation en¬vironments. This paper compares the performance characteristics o f these various support systems.
Subject:
[+]
NIOSH

Collection(s):
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:ac2e62c64c4dbf59876135a63ea6b5ad1a384f08997ddec1f306353c27c99864
File Type:

Supporting Files

• No Additional Files

More +