U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

The effect of delivery structure on costs, screening and health promotional services in state level National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Programs

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Cancer Causes Control
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Purpose

    We estimated the costs and effectiveness of state programs in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) based on the type of delivery structure.

    Methods

    Programs were classified into three delivery structures: (1) centralized, (2) decentralized, and (3) mixed. Centralized programs offer clinical services in satellite offices, but all other program activities are performed centrally. Decentralized programs contract with other entities to fully manage and provide screening and diagnostic services and other program activities. Programs with mixed service delivery structures have both centralized and decentralized features. Programmatic costs were averaged over a 3 year period (2006–2007, 2008–2009, and 2009–2010). Effectiveness was defined in terms of the average number of women served over the 3 years. We report costs per woman served by program activity and delivery structure and incremental cost effectiveness by program structure and by breast/cervical services.

    Results

    Average costs per woman served were lowest for mixed program structures (breast=$225, cervical = $216) compared to decentralized (breast = cervical = $276) and centralized program structures (breast = $259, cervical = $251). Compared with decentralized programs, for each additional woman served, centralized programs saved costs of $281 (breast) and $284 (cervical). Compared with decentralized programs, for each additional woman served, mixed programs added an additional $109 cost for breast but saved $1,777 for cervical cancer.

    Conclusions

    Mixed program structures were associated with the lowest screening and diagnostic costs per woman served and had generally favorable incremental costs relative to the other program structures.

  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Cancer Causes Control. 30(8):813-818
  • Pubmed ID:
    31187351
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC6684105
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    30
  • Issue:
    8
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:6b8c41256c8e6bee7ec2b27691309c90dc132956315baa1c775a0f2e82245029
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 344.97 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.