Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured

Details

• Journal Article:
  Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD)
• Personal Author:
  Nadel, Marion R. ; Royalty, Janet ; Joseph, Djenaba ; Rockwell, Tanner ; Helsel, William ; Kammerer, William ; Gray, Simone C. ; Shapiro, Jean A.
• Description:
  Introduction
  
  Screening can decrease colorectal cancer incidence and mortality and is recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Poor quality of colorectal cancer screening can negate the benefit of screening. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of screening services provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Colorectal Cancer Control Program from July 2009 through June 2015.
  
  Methods
  
  We collected data from the program’s 29 grantees, funded to provide colorectal cancer screening and diagnostic services to asymptomatic, low-income, and underinsured or uninsured adults aged 50 to 64. We collected data on the dates and results of all screening and diagnostic tests and, for colonoscopies, on whether the cecum was reached, whether bowel preparation was adequate, and endoscopists’ recommendations for the next test.
  
  Results
  
  Overall, 82.9% (range among grantees, 50.0%–97.2%) of positive FOBTs/FITs were followed up by colonoscopy; 95.2% of colonoscopies occurred within 180 days of the positive stool test. Cecal intubation rates ranged among grantees from 94.2% to 100%. Adenoma detection rates met recommended threshold levels for almost all grantees. Recommendations for rescreening and surveillance intervals deviated from guidelines in both directions. Of clients with normal colonoscopies, 85.3% (range, 37.7%–99.7%) were told to return in 10 years, as recommended in national guidelines. Of clients with advanced adenomas, 55.2% (range, 20.0%–84.6%) were told to return in 3 years as recommended, 25.4% (range, 3.8%–56.6%) in 5 or more years, and 18.6% (range, 0%–47.2%) in less than 3 years.
  
  Conclusion
  
  Although overall screening quality was good, it varied considerably. Ongoing monitoring to identify performance problems is essential for all colorectal cancer screening activities, so that efforts designed to improve performance can be targeted to individual clinicians.
  
  
• Subjects:
  Original Research
• Source:
  Prev Chronic Dis. 16
• DOI:
  http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180452
• ISSN:
  1545-1151
• Pubmed ID:
  31146803
• Pubmed Central ID:
  PMC6549419
• Document Type:
  Journal Article
• Volume:
  16
• Collection(s):
  Preventing Chronic Disease
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:0e5c2c3d9a26299b95314770ff7591176dcd0d38abeed248e9c389cbd5995d6731d1622fffb7d17e80ca4a3bd41b19970248f7f9d5d11d55587f00677e3a1f3d
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/79564/cdc_79564_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 569.05 KB ]