Welcome to CDC stacks | VARIATION IN GRAVIMETRIC CORRECTION FACTORS FOR NEPHELOMETER-DERIVED ESTIMATES OF PERSONAL EXPOSURE TO PM2.5 - 79032 | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
VARIATION IN GRAVIMETRIC CORRECTION FACTORS FOR NEPHELOMETER-DERIVED ESTIMATES OF PERSONAL EXPOSURE TO PM2.5
  • Published Date:
    April 05 2019
  • Source:
    Environ Pollut. 250:251-261
  • Language:
    English


Public Access Version Available on: July 01, 2020 information icon
Please check back on the date listed above.
Details:
  • Keywords:
  • Pubmed ID:
    30999202
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC6535137
  • Description:
    Many portable monitors for quantifying mass concentrations of particulate matter air pollution rely on aerosol light scattering as the measurement method; however, the relationship between scattered light (what is measured) and aerosol mass concentration (the metric of interest) is a complex function of the refractive index, size distribution, and shape of the particles. In this study, we compared 33-h personal PM| concentrations measured simultaneously using nephelometry (personal DataRAM pDR-1200) and gravimetric filter sampling for working adults (44 participants, 249 samples). Nephelometer- and filter-derived 33-h average PM| concentrations were correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.77); however, the nephelometer-derived concentration was within 20% of the filter-derived concentration for only 13% of samples. The nephelometer/filter ratio, which is used to correct light-scattering measurements to a gravimetric sample, had a median value of 0.52 and varied by over a factor of three (10th percentile = 0.35, 90| percentile = 1.1). When 33-h samples with >50% of 10-s average nephelometer readings below the nephelometer limit of detection were removed from the dataset during sensitivity analyses, the fraction of nephelometer-derived concentrations that were within 20% of the filter-derived concentration increased to 25%. We also evaluated how much the accuracy of nephelometer-derived concentrations improved after applying: (1) a median correction factor derived from a subset of 44 gravimetric samples, (2) participant-specific correction factors derived from one same from each subject, and (3) correction factors predicted using linear models based on other variables recorded during the study. Each approach independently increased the fraction of nephelometer-derived concentrations that were within 20% of the filter-derived concentration to approximately 45%. These results illustrate the challenges with using light scattering (without correction to a concurrent gravimetric sample) to estimate personal exposure to PM| mass among mobile adults exposed to low daily average concentrations (median = 8 μg m| in this study).

  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: