Welcome to CDC stacks | U.S. Adult Attitudes About Electronic Vapor Product Use in Indoor Public Places - 78331 | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
U.S. Adult Attitudes About Electronic Vapor Product Use in Indoor Public Places
Filetype[PDF-86.82 KB]


Details:
  • Keywords:
  • Pubmed ID:
    30467090
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC6497465
  • Description:
    Introduction

    The U.S. Surgeon General has concluded that aerosol from electronic vapor products, such as e-cigarettes, can contain harmful and potentially harmful constituents. This study assessed the prevalence and determinants of U.S. adult attitudes toward electronic vapor product use in indoor public places.

    Methods

    Data from 2017 Summer Styles, an Internet survey of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years (n = 4,107) were analyzed in 2017. Respondents were asked, Do you favor or oppose allowing the use of electronic vapor products in indoor public places such as workplaces, restaurants, and bars? Responses were strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, and strongly oppose. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to determine sociodemographic correlates of opposition (somewhat or strongly).

    Results

    In 2017, a total of 82.4% of adults strongly or somewhat opposed the use of electronic vapor products in indoor public places, including 28.0% of current (past 30-day) electronic vapor product users and 52.7% of current cigarette smokers. After adjustment, opposition was significantly lower among current and former electronic vapor product users than never users, current cigarette smokers than never smokers, and people living with tobacco product users. Opposition was significantly higher among adults aged ≥45 years than those aged 18–24 years and among adults who had rules prohibiting electronic vapor product use in their vehicles or homes than those without such rules.

    Conclusions

    Approximately eight in ten U.S. adults, including more than one quarter of electronic vapor product users, opposed electronic vapor product use in indoor public places. Prohibiting electronic vapor product use in indoor public areas can protect bystanders from the health risks of secondhand electronic vapor product aerosol exposure.

  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: