Welcome to CDC stacks |
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
1722. The Changing Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States: Injection Drug Use as an Emerging Risk Factor for Candidemia
  • Published Date:
    November 26 2018
  • Source:
    Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018; 5(Suppl 1):S53-S54
Filetype[PDF-479.37 KB]


Details:
  • Alternative Title:
    Open Forum Infect Dis
  • Description:
    Background

    Known risk factors for candidemia include diabetes, malignancy, antibiotics, total parenteral nutrition (TPN), prolonged hospitalization, abdominal surgery, and central venous catheters. Injection drug use (IDU) is not a common risk factor. We used data from CDC Emerging Infections Program’s candidemia surveillance to assess prevalence of IDU among candidemia cases and compare IDU and non-IDU cases.

    Methods

    Active, population-based candidemia surveillance was conducted in 45 counties in 9 states during January–December 2017. Data from 2014 to 2016 were available from 4 states and were used to look for trends. A case was defined as blood culture with Candida in a surveillance area resident. We collected clinical information, including IDU in the past 12 months. Differences between IDU and non-IDU cases were tested using logistic regression.

    Results

    Of 1,018 candidemia cases in 2017, 123 (12%) occurred in the context of recent IDU (1% in Minnesota and 27% in New Mexico) (Figure 1). In the 4 states with pre-2017 data, the proportion of IDU cases increased from 7% in 2014 to 15% in 2017, with the proportion in Tennessee nearly tripling from 7% to 18% (Figure 2). IDU cases were younger than non-IDU cases (median 34 vs. 62 years, P < 0.001). Compared with non-IDU cases, IDU cases were less likely to have diabetes (16% vs. 35%; OR 0.4, CI 0.2–0.6), malignancies (7% vs. 30%; OR 0.2, CI 0.1–0.3), abdominal surgery (6% vs. 19%; OR 0.3, CI 0.1–0.6), receive TPN (6% vs. 27%; OR 0.2, CI 0.1–0.4) and were more likely to have hepatitis C (96% vs. 47%; OR 16.1, CI 10.4–24.9), be homeless (13% vs. 1%; OR 17.8, CI 7.1–44.6), and have polymicrobial blood cultures (33% vs. 17%; OR 2.4, CI 1.6–3.6). Median time from admission to candidemia was 0.5 vs. 3 days and in-hospital mortality was 7% vs. 28% for IDU and non-IDU cases, respectively.

    Conclusion

    In 2017, 1 in 8 candidemia cases had a history of IDU, including a quarter of cases in some sites. The proportion of such cases increased since 2014. IDU cases lacked many of the typical risk factors for candidemia, suggesting that IDU may be an independent risk factor. Given the growing opioid epidemic, further study is necessary to elucidate how people who inject drugs acquire candidemia and design effective interventions for prevention.

    Disclosures

    All authors: No reported disclosures.

  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC6253027
  • Document Type:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: