Quantitative relationships between perceived and objective need for health care--dentistry as a model.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Quantitative relationships between perceived and objective need for health care--dentistry as a model.

Filetype[PDF-1.29 MB]


  • English
    • Details Related Documents You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Public Health Rep
    • Personal Author:
    • Description:
      To elaborate and refine a previously devised method for quantifying the relationship between perceived and objectively determined dental disease, data on a random sample of 588 patients in two towns in England were analyzed. The data included the number of decayed (D), missing (M), and filled (F) teeth, composite DMF scores, and patients' self-assessments of the state of their teeth and the need for treatment. The study method was a combination of bioassay and psychophysical techniques. Categorical self-assessments of the state of teeth and the need for treatment were dichotomized to yield proportions, which, when transformed into logits, resulted in a linear relation to increments of dental disease. A 50% point for each of the component D, M, and F scores was derived from the intercept of the line of best fit. The D50 for both the state of teeth and the need for treatment was found to be closest to the objective measure (Dx), with the smallest standard error. Although males had a significantly lower D50 (0.5) than females (D50=2.1) for need for treatment, with no differences in D50 for state of teeth, the females actually had a significantly lower Dx. These data indicate that males as a group had a lower threshold for perception of the need for treatment. This finding contrasts with the observation in other studies that males actually use dental services less than females.
    • Subject:
    • Source:
      Public Health Rep. 91(6):508-513
    • Pubmed ID:
      825915
    • Pubmed Central ID:
      PMCnull
    • Document Type:
      Journal Article
    • Collection(s):
      Public Health Reports
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    Related Documents

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov