Welcome to CDC stacks | Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Preferred by U.S. Women - 58282 | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Preferred by U.S. Women
Filetype[PDF-445.85 KB]


Details:
  • Keywords:
  • Pubmed ID:
    30033024
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC6102077
  • Description:
    Introduction:

    Many U.S. women continue to be screened annually for cervical cancer, despite current guidelines that recommend 3- or 5-year screening intervals depending on screening modality and patient age.

    Methods:

    Data from 2012 and 2015 web-based surveys of U.S. adults were analyzed in 2017 to investigate U.S. women’s cervical cancer screening preferences. The study was limited to women aged ≥ 18 years without a hysterectomy or cervical cancer diagnosis (2012 n=1,380, 2015 n=1,339).

    Results:

    Women’s preference for 3- or 5-year screening intervals doubled during the study period (2012: 31.2%, 2015: 64.2%, p<0.001). The most preferred screening options in 2015 were co-testing every 3 years with the Pap and human papillomavirus tests (34.0%) and annual Pap testing (30.4%)—neither of which were recommended at that time or currently. Use of 3- and 5-year Pap testing intervals increased during the study period (2012: 6.9%, 2015: 12.9%, p<0.001), whereas annual Pap testing declined (2012: 48.5%, 2015: 35.6%, p<0.001). Among women who were regularly screened and preferred 3- or 5-year screening intervals, the minority reported screening practices that matched this preference (2012: 24.1%, 2015: 29.3%, p=0.71).

    Conclusions:

    Women’s preference for longer cervical cancer screening intervals has increased rapidly and outpaced utilization. At the same time, many women continue to be screened annually. Expanding appropriate screening may require increasing women’s and providers’ comfort with screening recommendations.

  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: