Evaluation of dust collector bags for reducing dust exposure of roof bolter operators
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners. As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Evaluation of dust collector bags for reducing dust exposure of roof bolter operators

Filetype[PDF-474.79 KB]


English

Details:

  • Corporate Authors:
  • Description:
    "The laboratory dust collector tests showed that 99.6% of the test dust fed into the collector was captured by the dustbags. Figure 1 shows the condition of the main chamber before and after testing. Total weight gain on the canister filter was over five times greater without use of the bag. The RAM-I unit showed respirable dust levels in the collector exhaust to be over two times higher when tests were conducted without the bags in place. The APS showed that the" number of total dust particles emitted from the exhaust was two times greater when the tests were conducted without the bags. Since nearly all the dust is contained in the bag, operator exposure is improved when emptying the collector box's main chamber. Filter loading is greatly decreased when using the bags, enabling longer periods of drilling without filter removal/cleaning. Pressure drop across the filter for all tests ranged from 3.0 to 3.3 in w.g. when the bag was used and from 4.0 to 8.4 in w.g. without the bag. Filtered air emitted from the collector has less respirable dust and fewer total dust particles when the bags are used. These results show that benefits from use of the bags are realized in all areas of operator exposure. In order to use these bags in underground coal mines, the dustbags must be accepted by MSHA as an optional item for the specific dust collection system and machine model (30 CFR 33). In addition, the collector must be equipped with a predump option and must have a retrofit kit installed inside the collector to connect to the bag. ." - NIOSHTIC-2

    "Milestones in Mining Safety and Health Technology."

    NIOSHTIC No 20031628

  • Subjects:
  • Series:
  • Subseries:
  • DOI:
  • Document Type:
  • Pages in Document:
    electronic; [2] p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
  • NIOSHTIC Number:
    20031628
  • Resource Number:
    DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2007-119; TN-523
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov