Baseline Prevalence of Birth Defects Associated with Congenital Zika Virus Infection — Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Atlanta, Georgia, 2013–2014
Supporting Files
Public Domain
-
Mar 03 2017
-
Details
-
Journal Article:Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)
-
Personal Author:Cragan, Janet D. ; Mai, Cara T. ; Petersen, Emily E. ; Liberman, Rebecca F. ; Forestieri, Nina E. ; Stevens, Alissa C. ; Delaney, Augustina ; Dawson, April L. ; Ellington, Sascha R. ; Shapiro-Mendoza, Carrie K. ; Dunn, Julie E. ; Higgins, Cathleen A. ; Meyer, Robert E. ; Williams, Tonya ; Polen, Kara N.D. ; Newsome, Kim ; Reynolds, Megan ; Isenburg, Jennifer ; Gilboa, Suzanne M. ; Meaney-Delman, Dana M. ; Moore, Cynthia A. ; Boyle, Coleen A. ; Honein, Margaret A.
-
Description:Zika Virus infection during pregnancy can cause serious brain abnormalities, but the full range of adverse outcomes is unknown (1). To better understand the impact of birth defects resulting from Zika Virus infection, the CDC Surveillance case definition established in 2016 for birth defects potentially related to Zika Virus infection* (2) was retrospectively applied to population-based birth defects Surveillance data collected during 2013-2014 in three areas before the introduction of Zika Virus (the pre-Zika years) into the World Health Organization's Region of the Americas (Americas) (3). These data, from Massachusetts (2013), North Carolina (2013), and Atlanta, Georgia (2013-2014), included 747 infants and fetuses with one or more of the birth defects meeting the case definition (pre-Zika prevalence = 2.86 per 1,000 live births). Brain abnormalities or microcephaly were the most frequently recorded (1.50 per 1,000), followed by neural tube defects and other early brain malformations| (0.88), eye abnormalities without mention of a brain abnormality (0.31), and other consequences of central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction without mention of brain or eye abnormalities (0.17). During January 15-September 22, 2016, the U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry (USZPR) reported 26 infants and fetuses with these same defects among 442 completed pregnancies (58.8 per 1,000) born to mothers with laboratory evidence of possible Zika Virus infection during pregnancy (2). Although the ascertainment Methods differed, this finding was approximately 20 times higher than the proportion of one or more of the same birth defects among pregnancies during the pre-Zika years. These data demonstrate the importance of population-based Surveillance for interpreting data about birth defects potentially related to Zika Virus infection.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:MMWR Morbidity Mortal Weekly Rep. 66(8):219-222.
-
Series:
-
DOI:
-
ISSN:0149-2195 (print) ; 1545-861X (digital)
-
Pubmed ID:28253231
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5657891
-
Document Type:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Pages in Document:4 pdf pages
-
Volume:66
-
Issue:8
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:cabbce09a849c52f4f8a54be01e6ca0ea24bc2c458e337853680b95ba34e9ffce0cb7cb971792ae2f918619ad68ac761c227fb5f893d89338fbf20e761ac779a
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)