A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration☆
Supporting Files
-
2014
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Aggress Violent Behav
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:This systematic review examined 140 outcome evaluations of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. The review had two goals: 1) to describe and assess the breadth, quality, and evolution of evaluation research in this area; and 2) to summarize the best available research evidence for sexual violence prevention practitioners by categorizing programs with regard to their evidence of effectiveness on sexual violence behavioral outcomes in a rigorous evaluation. The majority of sexual violence prevention strategies in the evaluation literature are brief, psycho-educational programs focused on increasing knowledge or changing attitudes, none of which have shown evidence of effectiveness on sexually violent behavior using a rigorous evaluation design. Based on evaluation studies included in the current review, only three primary prevention strategies have demonstrated significant effects on sexually violent behavior in a rigorous outcome evaluation: | (Foshee et al., 2004); | (building-level intervention only, Taylor, Stein, Woods, Mumford, & Forum, 2011); and funding associated with the 1994 U.S. | (VAWA; Boba & Lilley, 2009). The dearth of effective prevention strategies available to date may reflect a lack of fit between the design of many of the existing programs and the principles of effective prevention identified by Nation et al. (2003).
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Aggress Violent Behav. 19(4):346-362
-
Pubmed ID:29606897
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5875446
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:19
-
Issue:4
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:ef5c955bedd5818b87fff32622f39b024d27f2d6ff311c9cd7ccd1cf596da3f5
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access