Welcome to CDC stacks |
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
An economic evaluation of anonymised information sharing in a partnership between health services, police and local government for preventing violence-related injury
  • Published Date:
    Sep 18 2013
  • Source:
    Inj Prev. 20(2):108-114.
Filetype[PDF-525.23 KB]

  • Alternative Title:
    Inj Prev
  • Description:

    To assess the costs and benefits of a partnership between health services, police and local government shown to reduce violence related injury.


    Cost benefit analysis


    Anonymised information sharing and use led to a reduction in wounding recorded by the police that reduced the economic and social costs of violence by £6.9 million in 2007 compared to the costs the intervention city, Cardiff UK, would have experienced in the absence of the programme. This includes a gross cost reduction of £1.25 million to the health service and £1.62 million to the criminal justice system in 2007. In contrast, the costs associated with the programme are modest: setup costs of software modifications and prevention strategies were £107,769, while the annual operating costs of the system were estimated as £210,433 (2003 UK Pound). The cumulative social benefit/cost ratio of the programme from 2003 to 2007 was £82 in benefits for each pound spent on the programme, including a benefit cost ratio of 14.8 for the health service and 19.1 for the criminal justice system. Each of these benefit/cost ratios is above 1 across a wide range of sensitivity analyses.


    An effective information sharing partnership between health services, police, and local government in Cardiff, UK, led to substantial cost savings to the health service and the criminal justice system compared with 14 other cities in England and Wales designated as similar by the UK government where this intervention was not implemented.

  • Pubmed ID:
  • Pubmed Central ID:
  • Document Type:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: