Equivalent survival after nipple-sparing compared to non-nipple-sparing mastectomy: data from California, 1988–2013
Supporting Files
-
Sep 24 2016
-
Available in CDC Stacks on 2018-01-09T00:00:00Z
File Language:
English
Details
-
Alternative Title:Breast Cancer Res Treat
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Purpose ; Nipple-sparing mastectomy, which may improve cosmesis, body image, and sexual function in comparison to non-nipple-sparing mastectomy, is increasingly used to treat early-stage breast cancer; however, long-term survival data are lacking. We evaluated survival after nipple-sparing mastectomy versus non-nipple-sparing mastectomy in a population-based cancer registry. ; Methods ; We conducted an observational study using the California Cancer Registry, considering all stage 0–III breast cancers diagnosed in California from 1988 to 2013. We compared breast cancer-specific and overall survival time after nipple-sparing versus non-nipple-sparing mastectomy, using multivariable analysis. ; Results ; Among 157,592 stage 0–III female breast cancer patients treated with unilateral mastectomy from 1988–2013, 993 (0.6 %) were reported as having nipple-sparing and 156,599 (99.4 %) non-nipple-sparing mastectomies; median follow-up was 7.9 years. The proportion of mastectomies that were nipple-sparing increased over time (1988, 0.2 %; 2013, 5.1 %) and with neighborhood socioeconomic status, and decreased with age and stage. On multivariable analysis, nipple-sparing mastectomy was associated with a lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality compared to non-nipple-sparing mastectomy hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.98. However, when restricting to diagnoses 1996 or later and adjusting for a larger set of covariates, risk was attenuated (HR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.52–1.42). ; Conclusions ; Among California breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1988–2013, nipple-sparing mastectomy was not associated with worse survival than non-nipple-sparing mastectomy. These results may inform the decisions of patients and doctors deliberating between these surgical approaches for breast cancer treatment.
-
Subjects:
-
Source:Breast Cancer Res Treat. 160(2):333-338.
-
Pubmed ID:27665587
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5759961
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Volume:160
-
Issue:2
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:bdd22d395f5f5ea117b0c3fb0e1a8a23aea91a448dc199a69f375202b49cbee9
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like
COLLECTION
CDC Public Access