Details:

Alternative Title:
J Multidiscip Eval
Personal Author:
Volkov, Boris; MacDonald, Goldie; Herrera, Dionisio; Jones, Donna; Patel, Mahomed;
Volkov, Boris; MacDonald, Goldie; Herrera, Dionisio; Jones, Donna; Patel, Mahomed; Less -
Description:
Background Often evaluations of training programs are limited — with many focusing on the aspects that are easy to measure (e.g., reaction of trainees) without addressing the important outcomes of training, such as how trainees applied their new knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Numerous evaluations fail to measure training’s effect on job performance because few effective methods are available to do so. Particularly difficult is the problem of evaluating multisite training programs that vary considerably in structure and implementation from one site to another. Purpose NA Setting Intervention Research Design We devised a method of a consensus expert review to evaluate the quality of conference abstracts submitted by participants in Field Epidemiology Training Programs – an approach that can provide useful information on how well trainees apply knowledge and skills gained in training, complementing data obtained from other sources and methods. This method is practical, minimally intrusive, and resource-efficient, and it may prove useful for evaluation practice in diverse fields that require training. Data Collection and Analysis Findings
Subject:
[+]
Abstract Quality
Article
Consensus Expert Review
Evaluation Of Training
Multisite Evaluation

Source:
J Multidiscip Eval. 10(23):44-50.;
Pubmed ID:
28659726
Pubmed Central ID:
PMC5484422
Document Type:
Journal Article;
Funding:
CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS/United States;
Collection(s):
CDC Public Access
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:999ca50158f36846ecac6c345715194746e792f6b49685de2923a497d2f1f1ac
File Type:

Supporting Files

• nihms861839.nxml

  bin

More +