U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Economic Evaluation of Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Ann Intern Med
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background

    Diabetes is a highly prevalent and costly disease. Studies indicate that combined diet and physical activity promotion programs can prevent type 2 diabetes among persons at increased risk.

    Purpose

    To systematically evaluate the evidence on cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit estimates of diet and physical activity promotion programs.

    Data Sources

    Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, EconLit, and CINAHL through 7 April 2015.

    Study Selection

    English-language studies from high-income countries that provided data on cost, cost-effectiveness, or cost-benefit ratios of diet and physical activity promotion programs with at least 2 sessions over at least 3 months delivered to persons at increased risk for type 2 diabetes.

    Data Extraction

    Dual abstraction and assessment of relevant study details.

    Data Synthesis

    Twenty-eight studies were included. Costs were expressed in 2013 U.S. dollars. The median program cost per participant was $653. Costs were lower for group-based programs (median, $417) and programs implemented in community or primary care settings (median, $424) than for the U.S. DPP (Diabetes Prevention Program) trial and the DPP Outcomes Study ($5881). Twenty-two studies assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the programs. From a health system perspective, 16 studies reported a median ICER of $13 761 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Group-based programs were more cost-effective (median, $1819 per QALY) than those that used individual sessions (median, $15 846 per QALY). No cost-benefit studies were identified.

    Limitation

    Information on recruitment costs and cost-effectiveness of translational programs implemented in community and primary care settings was limited.

    Conclusion

    Diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes are cost-effective among persons at increased risk. Costs are lower when programs are delivered to groups in community or primary care settings.

    Primary Funding Source

    None.

  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Ann Intern Med. 163(6):452-460
  • Pubmed ID:
    26167962
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC4913890
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    163
  • Issue:
    6
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:bb15a6bda8f6bfd517ee0bb50ae1998fad9a45a8fd28ae24581774dc78da7bf2
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 360.87 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.